Moos Merry-K
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 214 MacNider Building, CB# 7516, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2006 Mar-Apr;35(2):278-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2006.00039.x.
Prenatal care is a venerable tradition in the U.S. health care system and one that deserves critical examination. Inordinate amounts of public and personal resources are expended on a tradition of care that has not proven itself equal to current perinatal prevention challenges. In this article, the evolution of prenatal care is reviewed, its efficacy is critiqued, and efforts at restructuring the content and processes of care are examined. Three promising alternatives to the dominant medical model are described: the comprehensive prenatal care approach illustrated by many publicly funded prenatal clinics, the prenatal empowerment model as exemplified by midwifery care, and the prenatal group model as illustrated by CenteringPregnancy. Nurses are called upon to champion prenatal options for women.
产前护理在美国医疗保健系统中是一项由来已久的传统,值得进行批判性审视。大量的公共资源和个人资源被投入到一种护理传统中,而这种传统并未证明自己能够应对当前围产期预防方面的挑战。在本文中,我们回顾了产前护理的发展历程,对其功效进行了批判,并审视了在重组护理内容和流程方面所做的努力。文中描述了三种有前景的替代主导医学模式的方法:许多由公共资金资助的产前诊所所采用的全面产前护理方法、以助产护理为代表的产前赋权模式,以及以“孕期中心”为例的产前小组模式。文章呼吁护士们为女性倡导产前护理的多种选择。