Bućin Dragan, Johansson Sune, Lindberg Lars O
Blood Centre, Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Xenotransplantation. 2006 Mar;13(2):101-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3089.2006.00276.x.
We have successfully performed heart transplantation despite the most unfavourable risk factors for graft and patient survival: the presence of a high level of antibodies (Abs) against the donor's human leukocyte antigens (HLA) class I/II and blood group A1 antigens. The present study concerns post-transplant follow-up and characterization of donor reactive antibodies (DRA).
Pre-transplant treatment consisted of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), prednisolone, tacrolimus, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), rituximab, protein-A immunoadsorption (PAIA) and per-operative plasma exchange. A standard triple-drug immunosuppressive protocol was used post-operatively. Abs were analyzed by the complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) test against donor and panel B/T cells and by flow cytometry (FlowPRA tests detecting isolated HLA class I/II antigens). Abs against the donor's erythrocytes were analyzed using a standard direct agglutination test for immunoglobulin M (IgM) Abs and a Bio-Rad AHG gel card test detecting IgG Abs and C3d.
Pre-transplant treatment reduced Ab titers against the donor's lymphocytes from 128 to 16 and against the donor's blood group A1 antigen from 256 to 0. The patient was emergently transplanted with a heart from a blood group incompatible donor (A1 secretor to O). No hyperacute rejection was seen. DRA were present against all mismatched HLA class I and class II antigens at the time of transplantation; two of these DRA Abs disappeared within the first year post-transplant (anti-B62 and anti-DR4), one showed weakened reactivity (anti-A24) and one is still strongly reactive (anti-DQ3). The donor-specific CDC cross-match is still positive (titers 2 to 8). The level of panel reactive antibodies (PRA) remained unchanged from 6 months on post-transplant. Rising anti-A1 blood group Abs preceded the second rejection and were adsorbed by two blood group specific immunoadsorptions (Glycosorb)-ABO) and remained at a low level. IgM anti-A1 blood group Abs disappeared at 1 yr post-transplant and IgG Abs are still reactive with blood group A1 erythrocytes but at low titers (1 to 2).
The patient is clinically well 2 years after heart transplantation despite the constant persistence of donor reactive IgG Abs against blood group A1 and HLA-DQ antigens. The reactivity of DRA against other mismatched HLA antigens disappeared or weakened during the follow-up period.
尽管存在不利于移植物和患者存活的危险因素,即存在高水平的针对供体人类白细胞抗原(HLA)I/II类和A1血型抗原的抗体(Abs),我们仍成功进行了心脏移植。本研究关注移植后的随访以及供体反应性抗体(DRA)的特征。
移植前治疗包括霉酚酸酯(MMF)、泼尼松龙、他克莫司、静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)、利妥昔单抗、蛋白A免疫吸附(PAIA)以及术中血浆置换。术后采用标准的三联药物免疫抑制方案。通过针对供体和B/T细胞板的补体依赖细胞毒性(CDC)试验以及流式细胞术(检测分离的HLA I/II类抗原的FlowPRA试验)分析抗体。使用针对免疫球蛋白M(IgM)抗体的标准直接凝集试验以及检测IgG抗体和C3d的Bio-Rad抗球蛋白凝胶卡试验分析针对供体红细胞的抗体。
移植前治疗使针对供体淋巴细胞的抗体滴度从128降至16,针对供体A1血型抗原的抗体滴度从256降至0。患者紧急接受了来自血型不相合供体(A1分泌型到O型)的心脏移植。未观察到超急性排斥反应。移植时针对所有不匹配的HLA I类和II类抗原均存在DRA;其中两种DRA抗体在移植后第一年内消失(抗B62和抗DR4),一种反应性减弱(抗A24),一种仍具有强烈反应性(抗DQ3)。供体特异性CDC交叉配型仍为阳性(滴度2至8)。移植后6个月起,群体反应性抗体(PRA)水平保持不变。第二次排斥反应前抗A1血型抗体水平升高,并通过两次血型特异性免疫吸附(Glycosorb-ABO)吸附,且维持在低水平。IgM抗A1血型抗体在移植后1年消失,IgG抗体仍与A1血型红细胞反应,但滴度较低(1至2)。
心脏移植术后2年,尽管持续存在针对A1血型和HLA-DQ抗原的供体反应性IgG抗体,但患者临床状况良好。随访期间,DRA针对其他不匹配HLA抗原的反应性消失或减弱。