Suppr超能文献

[关于改进新生儿窒息诊断标准的临床研究]

[Clinical study on improving the diagnostic criteria for neonatal asphyxia].

作者信息

Chen Zi-li, He Rui-zhi, Peng Qian, Guo Ke-yu, Zhang Yu-qiong, Yuan Hui-hua

机构信息

Department of Neonatology, Dongguan Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Dongguan 523002, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Er Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Mar;44(3):167-72.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Diagnosing neonatal asphyxia solely according to Apgar score may lead to misdiagnosis. The aim of this study was to explore new and more accurate diagnostic criteria for neonatal asphyxia.

METHODS

Totally 10 376 live born neonates in our hospital were consecutively enrolled into the study. The following five items related to birth asphyxia, i.e., antepartum high-risk factors, Apgar scores, umbilical artery blood pH, organ injury, differential diagnosis on the causes of low Apgar score cases were examined and registered. The relationship among the first 4 items were analyzed. By differential diagnosis, the sensitivity and specificity of each index on diagnosing asphyxia and their complementary value on each other were investigated.

RESULTS

The items correlated well with each other (P < 0.01 or < 0.05) but were not entirely parallel and consistent; they could complement but could not substitute for each other. The sensitivity of antepartum high-risk factors, low Apgar scores, umbilical artery blood pH < 7.00 and organ injury was 100%, 100%, 44.44% and 100%, while the specificity was 17.99%, 98.90%, 96.05% and 96.62%, respectively. Of the 230 low Apgar score cases in this series only 50.9% coincided with asphyxia. For the 230 cases, when low Apgar score was combined with umbilical artery blood pH < 7.00, the sensitivity and specificity were 41% and 99.1% and when low Apgar score was combined with umbilical artery blood pH < 7.20, the sensitivity and specificity were 100% and 29.20%, respectively. After organ injury was added, the specificity was increased to 65.49%. When differential diagnosis was further added to exclude the other causes of low Apgar score cases, the misdiagnosis rate was minimized.

CONCLUSION

Up to now, no single accurate index for diagnosing neonatal asphyxia is available. In order to increase diagnostic bases and reduce misdiagnosis, the criteria of sole Apgar score should be replaced by multi-index diagnostic criteria. Based on the present study, a set of integrated diagnostic criteria for neonatal asphyxia is proposed: (1) prenatal high-risk factors, (2) low Apgar scores (respiratory depression must present), (3) umbilical artery blood pH < 7.00, if only pH < 7.20, the items (2) (4) (5) must be present, (4) hypoxic-ischemic organ injury (at least one organ dysfunction), (5) the other causes of low Apgar scores should be excluded. The last 4 indexes should all be met and the first one serves as reference. If multi-organ (three or more organs) dysfunction and (or) hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy are present, severe asphyxia can be diagnosed.

摘要

目的

仅依据阿氏评分诊断新生儿窒息可能导致误诊。本研究旨在探索更准确的新生儿窒息诊断新标准。

方法

我院共10376例活产新生儿连续纳入本研究。对以下五项与出生窒息相关的项目进行检查和记录,即产前高危因素、阿氏评分、脐动脉血pH值、器官损伤、对低阿氏评分病例病因的鉴别诊断。分析前四项之间的关系。通过鉴别诊断,研究各指标对窒息诊断的敏感性和特异性及其相互间的互补价值。

结果

各项之间相关性良好(P<0.01或<0.05),但并非完全平行一致;它们可相互补充但不能相互替代。产前高危因素、低阿氏评分、脐动脉血pH值<7.00和器官损伤的敏感性分别为100%、100%、44.44%和100%,特异性分别为17.99%、98.90%、96.05%和96.62%。本系列230例低阿氏评分病例中仅50.9%符合窒息诊断。对于这230例病例,当低阿氏评分与脐动脉血pH值<7.00联合时,敏感性和特异性分别为41%和99.1%;当低阿氏评分与脐动脉血pH值<7.20联合时,敏感性和特异性分别为100%和29.20%。加入器官损伤后,特异性提高到65.49%。进一步加入鉴别诊断以排除低阿氏评分病例的其他病因后,误诊率降至最低。

结论

目前尚无单一准确指标可用于诊断新生儿窒息。为增加诊断依据并减少误诊,应将单一阿氏评分标准改为多指标诊断标准。基于本研究,提出一套新生儿窒息综合诊断标准:(1)产前高危因素;(2)低阿氏评分(必须存在呼吸抑制);(3)脐动脉血pH值<7.00,若仅pH值<7.20,则必须同时存在(2)(4)(5)项;(4)缺氧缺血性器官损伤(至少一个器官功能障碍);(5)排除低阿氏评分的其他病因。后四项指标应全部满足,第一项作为参考。若存在多器官(三个或以上器官)功能障碍和(或)缺氧缺血性脑病,则可诊断为重度窒息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验