Mitchell Gail J, Bournes Debra A
York University, Toronto, Canada.
Nurs Sci Q. 2006 Apr;19(2):116-9; discussion 120-2. doi: 10.1177/0894318406287490.
This column is a response to Reed and Rolfe's column in the January 2006 issue of Nursing Science Quarterly. The authors present their views about Reed and Rolfe's ideas by focusing their discussion and questions on three main topics: the impact of nurses' conceptual thinking, values, and culture on their perspectives and experiences; the reality that nursing theory-guided practice is already a meaningful reality in nursing; and the belief that in order not to limit knowledge development, science must be viewed as more than a study of proximal causes.
本专栏是对里德和罗尔夫发表于《护理科学季刊》2006年1月那期的专栏文章的回应。作者们通过将讨论和问题聚焦于三个主要主题来阐述他们对里德和罗尔夫观点的看法:护士的概念性思维、价值观和文化对其观点及经历的影响;护理理论指导下的实践在护理领域已然是一个有意义的现实这一事实;以及认为为了不限制知识发展,科学必须被视为不仅仅是对直接原因的研究这一信念。