Hodson E M, Habashy D, Craig J C
Children's Hospital at Westmead, Centre for Kidney Research, Locked Bag 4001, Westmead, NSW, Australia, 2145.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Apr 19(2):CD003594. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003594.pub3.
The majority of children who present with their first episode of nephrotic syndrome, achieve remission with corticosteroid therapy. Children who fail to respond may be treated with immunosuppressive agents such as cyclophosphamide, chlorambucil or cyclosporin, or with non-immunosuppressive agents such as ACE inhibitors. Optimal combinations of these agents with the least toxicity remain to be determined.
To evaluate the benefits and harms of interventions used to treat idiopathic steroid resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) in children.
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, reference lists of articles and abstracts from conference proceedings. Date of most recent search: June 2005
RCTs and quasi-RCTs were included if they compared different immunosuppressive agents or non-immunosuppressive agents with placebo, prednisone or other agent given orally or parenterally in children aged three months to 18 years with SRNS.
Two reviewers independently searched the literature, determined trial eligibility, assessed quality, extracted data and entered it in RevMan. For dichotomous outcomes, results were expressed as relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Data were pooled using the random effects model.
Eleven RCTs (312 children) were included. Cyclosporin when compared with placebo or no treatment significantly increased the number of children who achieved complete remission (three trials, 49 children: RR for persistent nephrotic syndrome 0.64, 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.88). There was no significant difference in the number of children who achieved complete remission between oral cyclophosphamide with prednisone and prednisone alone (two trials, 91 children: RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.74 to 1.36), between intravenous cyclophosphamide and oral cyclophosphamide (one study, 11 children: RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.01 to 1.39) and between azathioprine with prednisone and prednisone alone (one trial 31 children: RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.32). ACE inhibitors significantly reduced proteinuria (two trials, 70 children). After 12 weeks of treatment fosinopril reduced proteinuria by 0.95 g/24 h (95% CI -1.21 to -0.69). No RCTs were identified comparing combination regimens comprising high dose steroids, alkylating agents or cyclosporin with single agents, placebo or no treatment.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Further adequately powered and well designed RCTs are needed to confirm the efficacy of cyclosporin and to evaluate other regimens for idiopathic SRNS including high dose steroids with alkylating agents or cyclosporin.
大多数首次出现肾病综合征的儿童通过皮质类固醇治疗可实现缓解。无反应的儿童可能接受免疫抑制剂治疗,如环磷酰胺、苯丁酸氮芥或环孢素,或接受非免疫抑制剂治疗,如血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂。这些药物的最佳组合及其最低毒性仍有待确定。
评估用于治疗儿童特发性类固醇抵抗性肾病综合征(SRNS)的干预措施的益处和危害。
从Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)、医学索引数据库(MEDLINE)、荷兰医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)、文章参考文献列表以及会议论文摘要中识别随机对照试验(RCT)。最近一次检索日期:2005年6月
纳入比较不同免疫抑制剂或非免疫抑制剂与安慰剂、泼尼松或其他口服或胃肠外给药的药物,用于治疗3个月至18岁SRNS儿童的RCT和半随机对照试验(quasi - RCT)。
两名综述员独立检索文献,确定试验合格性,评估质量,提取数据并录入RevMan。对于二分法结果,结果表示为相对危险度(RR)和95%置信区间(CI)。数据采用随机效应模型合并。
纳入11项RCT(312名儿童)。与安慰剂或未治疗相比,环孢素显著增加实现完全缓解的儿童数量(三项试验,49名儿童:持续性肾病综合征的RR为0.64,95%CI为0.47至0.88)。口服环磷酰胺联合泼尼松与单独使用泼尼松相比,实现完全缓解的儿童数量无显著差异(两项试验,91名儿童:RR为1.01,95%CI为0.74至1.36);静脉注射环磷酰胺与口服环磷酰胺相比无显著差异(一项研究,11名儿童:RR为0.09,95%CI为0.01至1.39);硫唑嘌呤联合泼尼松与单独使用泼尼松相比无显著差异(一项试验,31名儿童:RR为1.01,95%CI为0.77至1.32)。ACE抑制剂显著降低蛋白尿(两项试验,70名儿童)。治疗12周后,福辛普利使蛋白尿减少0.95g/24小时(95%CI为 - 1.21至 - 0.69)。未识别出比较包含高剂量类固醇、烷化剂或环孢素的联合方案与单一药物、安慰剂或未治疗的RCT。
需要进一步开展有足够样本量且设计良好的RCT,以确认环孢素的疗效,并评估特发性SRNS的其他治疗方案,包括高剂量类固醇与烷化剂或环孢素联合使用的方案。