Marier J F, Morin I, Al-Numani D, Stiles M, Morelli G, Tippabhotla S K, Vijan T, Singla A K, Garg M, Di Marco M, Monif T
MDS Pharma Services, St-Laurent (Montréal), Quebec, Canada.
Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Apr;44(4):180-4. doi: 10.5414/cpp44180.
Efavirenz is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) that has been used successfully for more than a decade to treat human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. The objective of the current study was to determine the bioequivalence between a generic capsule formulation of efavirenz and the innovator product.
A total of 41 healthy subjects (34 males and 8 females) received a single 200 mg oral dose of efavirenz as the generic (Ranbaxy-Efavirenz, Ranbaxy Laboratories Ltd.) and innovator (Sustiva, Bristol-Myers Squibb) capsule formulations under fasting conditions in a randomized, 2-way crossover study. Multiple blood samples were collected over 72 hours and plasma concentrations of efavirenz were assayed using an LC/MS/MS method. Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were calculated using non-compartmental methods.
Plasma concentrations of efavirenz peaked within 2.5 hours and then declined in a multi-exponential manner for both formulations. At 72 hours post dose, all plasma concentrations of efavirenz were above the LOQ of the assay (10 ng/ml). Mean area under the curve from 0 - 72 hours (AUC0-72) and maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) of efavirenz for the generic capsule formulation were 22,840 ng x h/ml and 1,199 ng/ml, respectively. Ratios and 90% confidence intervals of PK parameters between the two formulations were within 80.0 - 125.0%, suggesting that the two capsule formulations resulted in similar rate and extent of bioavailability under fasting conditions. Adverse events were similar in nature and frequency for the two formulations.
Based on the above results, the generic capsule formulation of efavirenz developed by Ranbaxy should be as effective as the innovator product.
依非韦伦是一种非核苷类逆转录酶抑制剂(NNRTI),已成功用于治疗人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染十余年。本研究的目的是确定依非韦伦通用胶囊制剂与创新产品之间的生物等效性。
在一项随机、双向交叉研究中,41名健康受试者(34名男性和8名女性)在禁食条件下接受了单次200mg口服剂量的依非韦伦,剂型分别为通用制剂(兰伯西-依非韦伦,兰伯西实验室有限公司)和创新制剂(施多宁,百时美施贵宝)胶囊。在72小时内采集多份血样,采用液相色谱/串联质谱法(LC/MS/MS)测定依非韦伦的血浆浓度。使用非房室方法计算药代动力学(PK)参数。
两种制剂的依非韦伦血浆浓度均在2.5小时内达到峰值,然后以多指数方式下降。给药后72小时,依非韦伦的所有血浆浓度均高于测定的定量下限(10ng/ml)。通用胶囊制剂的依非韦伦0至72小时曲线下平均面积(AUC0-72)和最大血浆浓度(Cmax)分别为22,840ng·h/ml和1,199ng/ml。两种制剂PK参数的比值和90%置信区间在80.0%-125.0%之间,表明两种胶囊制剂在禁食条件下的生物利用度速率和程度相似。两种制剂的不良事件在性质和频率上相似。
基于上述结果,兰伯西公司开发的依非韦伦通用胶囊制剂应与创新产品具有相同的疗效。