Suppr超能文献

重度创伤性脑损伤患者管理中的当前争议

Current controversies in the management of patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

作者信息

Adamides Alexios A, Winter Craig D, Lewis Philip M, Cooper D James, Kossmann Thomas, Rosenfeld Jeffrey V

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, The Alfred Hospital, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2006 Mar;76(3):163-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2006.03674.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury is a major cause of mortality and morbidity, particularly among young men. The efficacy and safety of most of the interventions used in the management of patients with traumatic brain injury remain unproven. Examples include the 'cerebral perfusion pressure-targeted' and 'volume-targeted' management strategies for optimizing cerebrovascular haemodynamics and specific interventions, such as hyperventilation, osmotherapy, cerebrospinal fluid drainage, barbiturates, decompressive craniectomy, therapeutic hypothermia, normobaric hyperoxia and hyperbaric oxygen therapy.

METHODS

A review of the literature was performed to examine the evidence base behind each intervention.

RESULTS

There is no class I evidence to support the routine use of any of the therapies examined.

CONCLUSION

Well-designed, large, randomized controlled trials are needed to determine therapies that are safe and effective from those that are ineffective or harmful.

摘要

背景

创伤性脑损伤是导致死亡和发病的主要原因,在年轻男性中尤为常见。用于治疗创伤性脑损伤患者的大多数干预措施的有效性和安全性尚未得到证实。例如,用于优化脑血管血流动力学的“脑灌注压靶向”和“容量靶向”管理策略,以及特定干预措施,如过度通气、渗透压疗法、脑脊液引流、巴比妥类药物、减压颅骨切除术、治疗性低温、常压高氧和高压氧治疗。

方法

对文献进行综述,以检查每种干预措施背后的证据基础。

结果

没有I类证据支持常规使用所研究的任何一种疗法。

结论

需要设计良好、大规模的随机对照试验,以确定哪些疗法是安全有效的,哪些是无效或有害的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验