• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新型心室自动夺获算法的急性性能评估

Acute performance evaluation of a new ventricular automatic capture algorithm.

作者信息

Sperzel Johannes, Nowak Bernd, Himmrich Ewald, Zhang Geng, König Andreas, Willems Roger, Reister Craig, Sathaye Alok, Fröhlig Gerd

机构信息

Kerckhoff-Klinik GmbH, Department of Cardiology and Electrophysiology Benekestrasse 2-8, D-61231 Bad Nauheim, Germany.

出版信息

Europace. 2006 Jan;8(1):65-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/euj008.

DOI:10.1093/europace/euj008
PMID:16627412
Abstract

AIMS

This study evaluated the acute clinical performance of a new ventricular automatic capture algorithm developed to work with all lead types and pacing vectors.

METHODS AND RESULTS

During regular pacemaker implant or replacement, AutoThreshold and manual threshold tests were performed in ventricular unipolar (UP) and bipolar (BP, if applicable) pacing using a customized external prototype INSIGNIA pacemaker. The success rate and accuracy of two different modes (commanded and ambulatory) of the automatic capture algorithm were used to evaluate the performance. Loss-of-capture events (two consecutive non-captured beats without backup pacing) were used to assess safety. Data of 53 patients (33 DDD/20 VVI) from four medical centres were analysed. Tested leads included 43 BP and 10 UP from nine manufacturers, and seven had electrodes with low polarization. The rate of successful commanded and ambulatory AutoThreshold tests was 96 and 94%, respectively, with an average absolute threshold difference compared with manual threshold of < 0.1 V at 0.4 ms (commanded 0.07 +/- 0.07 V and ambulatory 0.08 +/- 0.07 V). There was no significant difference in performance between UP/BP pacing, polarization, and lead type. No loss-of-capture event was observed.

CONCLUSION

When successful, the ventricular automatic capture algorithm accurately determined pacing thresholds in either a UP or BP pacing configuration among all leads tested.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了一种新开发的心室自动夺获算法的急性临床性能,该算法适用于所有类型的导线和起搏向量。

方法与结果

在常规起搏器植入或更换过程中,使用定制的外部原型INSIGNIA起搏器在心室单极(UP)和双极(如适用则为BP)起搏中进行自动阈值和手动阈值测试。使用自动夺获算法的两种不同模式(指令模式和动态模式)的成功率和准确性来评估性能。夺获失败事件(连续两个未夺获的搏动且无备用起搏)用于评估安全性。分析了来自四个医疗中心的53例患者(33例DDD/20例VVI)的数据。测试的导线包括来自九个制造商的43根BP和10根UP,其中七根具有低极化电极。指令模式和动态自动阈值测试的成功率分别为96%和94%,与手动阈值相比,在0.4毫秒时平均绝对阈值差异<0.1伏(指令模式为0.07±0.07伏,动态模式为0.08±0.07伏)。UP/BP起搏、极化和导线类型之间的性能无显著差异。未观察到夺获失败事件。

结论

成功时,心室自动夺获算法能在所有测试导线的UP或BP起搏配置中准确测定起搏阈值。

相似文献

1
Acute performance evaluation of a new ventricular automatic capture algorithm.一种新型心室自动夺获算法的急性性能评估
Europace. 2006 Jan;8(1):65-9. doi: 10.1093/europace/euj008.
2
Clinical performance of a ventricular automatic capture verification algorithm.心室自动夺获验证算法的临床性能
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Sep;28(9):933-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00196.x.
3
Performance of a ventricular automatic-capture algorithm in a wide clinical setting.心室自动夺获算法在广泛临床环境中的性能表现。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008 Dec;31(12):1546-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.01225.x.
4
Performance evaluation of a right atrial automatic capture verification algorithm using two different sensing configurations.使用两种不同传感配置对右心房自动捕获验证算法的性能评估。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2009 May;32(5):579-87. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02330.x.
5
A cardiac evoked response algorithm providing automatic threshold tracking for continuous capture verification: a single-center prospective study.一种用于连续捕获验证的具有自动阈值跟踪功能的心脏诱发反应算法:一项单中心前瞻性研究。
Indian Heart J. 2001 Jul-Aug;53(4):467-76.
6
Left ventricular pacing by automatic capture verification.通过自动夺获验证进行左心室起搏
Europace. 2007 Dec;9(12):1177-81. doi: 10.1093/europace/eum225. Epub 2007 Oct 11.
7
Acute clinical evaluation of a left ventricular automatic threshold determination algorithm based on evoked response sensing.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Mar;35(3):348-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03287.x. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
8
Evaluation of fusion beat detection with a new ventricular automatic capture algorithm in ICDs.采用新型心室自动夺获算法评估植入式心律转复除颤器中的融合搏动检测
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Jan;28 Suppl 1:S263-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00027.x.
9
Acute performance of a right ventricular automatic pacing threshold algorithm for implantable defibrillators.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Mar;35(3):259-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03286.x. Epub 2011 Dec 8.
10
Clinical evaluation of pacemaker automatic capture management and atrioventricular interval extension algorithm.起搏器自动夺获管理和房室间期延伸算法的临床评估。
Europace. 2013 Mar;15(3):395-401. doi: 10.1093/europace/eus309. Epub 2012 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Left ventricle pacing challenges in cardiac resynchronization therapy systems.心脏再同步治疗系统中的左心室起搏挑战
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2021 Jul-Aug;21(4):232-240. doi: 10.1016/j.ipej.2021.04.001. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
2
Clinical observation of atrial threshold monitoring algorithm: a single center experience.心房阈值监测算法的临床观察:单中心经验
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Apr 15;8(4):6079-84. eCollection 2015.