重大事件中的相关人员：为应急规划者规范角色头衔
Who's who at a major incident: standardising role titles for emergency planners.
作者信息
Mudalige M, Carley S, Mackway-Jones K
机构信息
Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.
出版信息
Emerg Med J. 2006 May;23(5):408-9. doi: 10.1136/emj.2005.030098.
OBJECTIVE
To standardise the names for key roles in a major incident.
METHODS
A Delphi study using experts in major incident planning.
RESULTS
There is clear consensus regarding the need for standard nomenclature. The expert group identified 28 roles, and 184 different names were initially given by group members for the 28 roles. Agreement on a common nomenclature was achieved in only 12/28 roles.
CONCLUSION
There is agreement for a standardised nomenclature for major incident roles. However, consensus may be difficult to achieve from within an expert group.
目的
规范重大事件中关键角色的名称。
方法
采用德尔菲法，咨询重大事件规划领域的专家。
结果
对于标准命名法的必要性存在明确共识。专家组确定了28个角色，小组成员最初为这28个角色给出了184个不同的名称。在28个角色中，仅12个角色达成了通用命名法的一致意见。
结论
对于重大事件角色的标准化命名法存在共识。然而，在专家小组内部可能难以达成共识。
Zotero 插件