Rosenthal Dorothy L, Geddes Susan, Trimble Cornelia L, Carson Kathryn A, Alli Patricia M
Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287-6940, USA.
Cancer. 2006 Jun 25;108(3):137-43. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21843.
This study was designed to optimize a liquid-based Papanicolaou (Pap) test by using common cytopathology laboratory equipment and resulted in an inexpensive test that was equivalent at least diagnostically to the conventional Papanicolaou (Pap) smear.
Adult women (n = 482) were consented, enrolled, and included in this Institutional Review Board-approved study. After conventional Pap smear slides were obtained, clinicians placed the collection device with residual cells from the uterine cervix in a preservative fluid. In the cytopathology laboratory, a conventional centrifuge device was used to deposit the cells from the liquid onto a glass slide.
Among the conventional Pap smears, 43 were categorized as low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), and 30 were categorized as high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions or greater (HSIL+). Among the PapSpin samples, 49 were categorized as LSIL and 24 were categorized as HSIL+. Biopsy confirmation was obtained in 124 patients. There were 23 women diagnosed with LSIL and 27 women diagnosed with HSIL+. Diagnostic agreement between cytologic samples and biopsies is as follows: for conventional Pap smears, there was agreement on 11 of 23 LSIL diagnoses and on 15 of 27 HSIL+ diagnoses; for PapSpin samples, there was agreement on 11 of 23 LSIL diagnoses and on 14 of 27 HSIL+ diagnoses. Exact agreement was achieved between PapSpin and conventional smears in 404 patients (84%). Quality indictors were better in the PapSpin group, except for inadequate endocervical component, which was greater in the PapSpin samples, a difference that was explained by the split-sample study design, which favored the conventional smear.
The current results indicated that PapSpin is a legitimate, inexpensive alternative to the conventional Pap smear for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, resulting in better preservation and improved cell visualization. In addition, the liquid residual allows for reflex human papillomavirus-DNA or polymerase chain reaction testing.
本研究旨在利用普通细胞病理学实验室设备优化液基巴氏试验,从而得到一种成本低廉且在诊断方面至少与传统巴氏涂片相当的检测方法。
482名成年女性同意参与本机构审查委员会批准的研究并被纳入。获取传统巴氏涂片玻片后,临床医生将带有子宫颈残留细胞的采集装置置于保存液中。在细胞病理学实验室,使用传统离心机将液体中的细胞沉积到载玻片上。
在传统巴氏涂片中,43例被归类为低级别鳞状上皮内病变(LSIL),30例被归类为高级别鳞状上皮内病变或更高级别(HSIL+)。在PapSpin样本中,49例被归类为LSIL,24例被归类为HSIL+。124名患者获得了活检确认。有23名女性被诊断为LSIL,27名女性被诊断为HSIL+。细胞学样本与活检之间的诊断一致性如下:对于传统巴氏涂片,23例LSIL诊断中有11例一致,27例HSIL+诊断中有15例一致;对于PapSpin样本,23例LSIL诊断中有11例一致,27例HSIL+诊断中有14例一致。404例患者(84%)的PapSpin和传统涂片之间达成了完全一致。除了宫颈管成分不足外,PapSpin组的质量指标更好,宫颈管成分不足在PapSpin样本中更常见,这种差异可通过有利于传统涂片的分样本研究设计来解释。
目前的结果表明,对于检测宫颈上皮内瘤变,PapSpin是传统巴氏涂片合法且廉价的替代方法,能更好地保存细胞并改善细胞可视化。此外,剩余液体可用于人乳头瘤病毒DNA或聚合酶链反应检测。