Wachterman Melissa W, Sommers Benjamin D
Department of Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
J Palliat Med. 2006 Apr;9(2):343-52. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2006.9.343.
End-of-life care poses a growing clinical and policy concern. Gender and marital status may play important roles in shaping end-of-life care.
To examine gender and marital status differences across multiple end-of-life care outcomes: primary residence in the last year of life (LYL), place of death, hospice use, type of formal and informal caregivers, and primary payment source for end-of-life care.
Retrospective cohort study using bivariate analyses and multivariate logistic regression.
A nationally representative sample of 12,771 individuals who died of natural causes, from the 1993 National Mortality Followback Survey.
After multivariate adjustment, the only gender differences in end-of-life care were that women were more likely to receive formal or informal care in the LYL and more likely to be on Medicaid. After adjustment, unmarried individuals (widowed, divorced/separated, and single) were more likely than married people to live their LYL and die in nursing homes, less likely to receive formal or informal care in the LYL, and more likely to be on Medicaid. Hospice use was low, with minimal gender and marital status differences.
Marital status is a key variable mediating gender differences in end-of-life care. Unmarried individuals are less likely to receive help from informal caregivers-most notably because of the lack of spousal care-which may explain why they are more likely to end up in nursing homes. Clinicians need to be aware of the impact of marital status on endof- life care. Policymakers should consider that women will be disproportionately affected by policy changes in public financing for end-of-life care.
临终关怀引发了越来越多的临床和政策关注。性别和婚姻状况可能在塑造临终关怀方面发挥重要作用。
研究在多个临终关怀结果方面的性别和婚姻状况差异:生命最后一年(LYL)的主要居住地、死亡地点、临终关怀服务的使用、正式和非正式护理人员的类型,以及临终关怀的主要支付来源。
采用双变量分析和多变量逻辑回归的回顾性队列研究。
来自1993年全国死亡率随访调查的12771名自然死亡个体的全国代表性样本。
经过多变量调整后,临终关怀方面唯一的性别差异是,女性在生命最后一年更有可能接受正式或非正式护理,且更有可能接受医疗补助。调整后,未婚个体(丧偶、离异/分居和单身)比已婚个体更有可能在生命最后一年居住在养老院并在养老院死亡,在生命最后一年接受正式或非正式护理的可能性较小,且更有可能接受医疗补助。临终关怀服务的使用率较低,在性别和婚姻状况方面差异不大。
婚姻状况是调节临终关怀中性别差异的关键变量。未婚个体不太可能得到非正式护理人员的帮助——最主要的原因是缺乏配偶护理——这可能解释了为什么他们更有可能最终住进养老院。临床医生需要意识到婚姻状况对临终关怀的影响。政策制定者应考虑到,女性将受到临终关怀公共融资政策变化的不成比例的影响。