• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

弱视

Amblyopia.

作者信息

Holmes Jonathan M, Clarke Michael P

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

出版信息

Lancet. 2006 Apr 22;367(9519):1343-51. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68581-4.

DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68581-4
PMID:16631913
Abstract

Results from recent randomised clinical trials in amblyopia should change our approach to screening for and treatment of amblyopia. Based on the current evidence, if one screening session is used, screening at school entry could be the most reasonable time. Clinicians should preferably use age-appropriate LogMAR acuity tests, and treatment should only be considered for children who are clearly not in the typical range for their age. Any substantial refractive error should be corrected before further treatment is considered and the child should be followed in spectacles until no further improvement is recorded, which can take up to 6 months. Parents and carers should then be offered an informed choice between patching and atropine drops. Successful patching regimens can last as little as 1 h or 2 h a day, and successful atropine regimens as little as one drop twice a week. Intense and extended regimens might not be needed in initial therapy.

摘要

近期弱视随机临床试验的结果应改变我们对弱视筛查和治疗的方法。基于目前的证据,如果只进行一次筛查,入学时筛查可能是最合理的时间。临床医生最好使用适合年龄的LogMAR视力测试,并且仅应考虑对明显不在其年龄典型范围内的儿童进行治疗。在考虑进一步治疗之前,应矫正任何显著的屈光不正,并且应让孩子佩戴眼镜随访,直到记录到没有进一步改善,这可能需要长达6个月的时间。然后,应向家长和照顾者提供关于眼罩治疗和阿托品滴眼液治疗的明智选择。成功的眼罩治疗方案每天可短至1小时或2小时,成功的阿托品治疗方案每周只需一滴,每天两次。初始治疗可能不需要强化和延长治疗方案。

相似文献

1
Amblyopia.弱视
Lancet. 2006 Apr 22;367(9519):1343-51. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68581-4.
2
Atropine vs patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia: follow-up at 15 years of age of a randomized clinical trial.阿托品与遮盖疗法治疗中度弱视的比较:一项随机临床试验15岁时的随访
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 Jul;132(7):799-805. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.392.
3
Compliance and patching and atropine amblyopia treatments.依从性、配镜及阿托品弱视治疗。
Vision Res. 2015 Sep;114:31-40. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.02.012. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
4
[The lazy eye - contemporary strategies of amblyopia treatment].[弱视——弱视治疗的当代策略]
Praxis (Bern 1994). 2011 Feb 16;100(4):229-35. doi: 10.1024/1661-8157/a00442.
5
A randomized trial of atropine vs. patching for treatment of moderate amblyopia in children.阿托品与眼罩治疗儿童中度弱视的随机试验。
Arch Ophthalmol. 2002 Mar;120(3):268-78. doi: 10.1001/archopht.120.3.268.
6
"Combined Occlusion and Atropine Therapy" Versus "Augmented Part-Time Patching" in Children with Refractory/Residual Amblyopia: A Pilot Study.“联合遮盖与阿托品疗法” 对比 “强化间歇性遮盖疗法” 治疗难治性/残余性弱视儿童:一项初步研究
Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr-Jun;23(2):201-7. doi: 10.4103/0974-9233.175892.
7
The effect on refractive error of unilateral atropine as compared with patching for the treatment of amblyopia.单侧阿托品与遮盖疗法治疗弱视对屈光不正的影响。
J AAPOS. 2007 Jun;11(3):300-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2006.09.017.
8
Atropine vs patching for treatment of amblyopia in children.阿托品与遮盖疗法治疗儿童弱视的比较
JAMA. 2002 Apr 24;287(16):2145-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.16.2145.
9
Identification and treatment of amblyopia.弱视的识别与治疗。
Am Fam Physician. 2013 Mar 1;87(5):348-52.
10
A comparison of atropine and patching treatments for moderate amblyopia by patient age, cause of amblyopia, depth of amblyopia, and other factors.根据患者年龄、弱视病因、弱视程度及其他因素,对阿托品和遮盖疗法治疗中度弱视的比较。
Ophthalmology. 2003 Aug;110(8):1632-7; discussion 1637-8. doi: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00500-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Evolving Strategies in Amblyopia Management: From Traditional Therapies to Cutting-Edge Innovations.弱视治疗的发展策略:从传统疗法到前沿创新
Cureus. 2025 Jul 15;17(7):e88012. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88012. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Multisensory integration, brain plasticity and optogenetics in visual rehabilitation.视觉康复中的多感官整合、脑可塑性与光遗传学
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 10;16:1590305. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1590305. eCollection 2025.
3
Comparative Neuroplasticity in Frontal- and Lateral-Eyed Mammals With Induced-Binocular Vision Dysfunction: Insights From Monocular Deprivation Models.
诱导性双眼视觉功能障碍的额眼和侧眼哺乳动物的比较神经可塑性:来自单眼剥夺模型的见解
Eur J Neurosci. 2025 Jul;62(1):e70179. doi: 10.1111/ejn.70179.
4
Comparison of a novel gamified binocular therapy and standard monocular patching therapy in treating unilateral amblyopia in young children: a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial.新型游戏化双眼疗法与标准单眼遮盖疗法治疗幼儿单侧弱视的比较:一项前瞻性、多中心、随机对照试验。
Trials. 2025 Jun 20;26(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08933-4.
5
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in the Era of Large Language Models: Applying an XAI Framework in Pediatric Ophthalmology Diagnosis using the Gemini Model.大语言模型时代的可解释人工智能(XAI):在儿科眼科诊断中使用Gemini模型应用XAI框架
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2025 Jun 10;2025:566-575. eCollection 2025.
6
Psychophysical assessment of face perception deficits in adults with amblyopia through top-down and bottom-up visual processing pathways.通过自上而下和自下而上的视觉处理通路对成人弱视患者面部感知缺陷进行心理物理学评估。
Front Neurosci. 2025 May 21;19:1548243. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2025.1548243. eCollection 2025.
7
Original research: factors related to persistent amblyopia after surgical correction in unilateral congenital blepharoptosis.原创研究:单侧先天性上睑下垂手术矫正后持续性弱视的相关因素
BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 2;25(1):330. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-04169-7.
8
Monocular Contrast Sensitivity Visual Perceptual Learning Rebalances Adult Amblyopes' Two Eyes.单眼对比敏感度视觉感知学习可使成人弱视患者的双眼重新平衡。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2025 May 1;66(5):25. doi: 10.1167/iovs.66.5.25.
9
Choroidal vascular characteristics in anisometropic amblyopia: a comparative analysis.屈光参差性弱视的脉络膜血管特征:一项对比分析。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2025 May 21;25(1):301. doi: 10.1186/s12886-025-04143-3.
10
The interplay between Hebbian and homeostatic plasticity in the adult visual cortex.成年视觉皮层中赫布可塑性与稳态可塑性之间的相互作用。
J Physiol. 2025 Mar;603(6):1521-1540. doi: 10.1113/JP287665. Epub 2025 Feb 28.