Morgan Michael M, Fossum Erin N, Stalding Brandon M, King Melissa M
Department of Psychology, Washington State University, Vancouver, Washington 98660, USA.
J Pain. 2006 May;7(5):358-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2005.12.009.
Many tests are used to assess nociception in laboratory animals. The objective of this study was to compare morphine potency across tests. Rats were injected with saline or morphine (1-20 mg/kg SC), and nociception was assessed 15-20 min later. A consistent definition of antinociception-a change in response greater than 4 times the standard deviation above the mean for the saline-treated controls-was used to compare morphine potency on different tests. These data revealed 4 things. 1) Morphine potency was greatest on the paw pressure, hot plate, and tail withdrawal tests and lowest on the formalin test. 2) Stimulus intensity had no effect on morphine potency on the hot plate (ED50 = 4.5, 2.8, and 2.6 mg/kg for 49 degrees C, 52 degrees C, and 55 degrees C tests, respectively) or tail withdrawal tests (ED50 = 2.9 and 2.6 for 48 degrees C and 52 degrees C water, respectively). 3) Assessment of morphine potency using a within-subjects cumulative dosing procedure resulted in lower ED50 values compared to data collected using a between-subjects design (hot plate: 2.6 vs 4.9; tail withdrawal: 2.6-2.9 vs 5.7 mg/kg). 4) Adjusting the cutoff value from 4 to 5, 6, 7, and 8 standard deviations greater than the mean resulted in a progressive increase in ED50 values. These data demonstrate that morphine potency is dependent, in part, on the nociceptive test even when all other factors (eg, species, strain, age, gender, and cutoff value) are held constant.
The ability of morphine to block nociception is influenced by many factors. The present study shows that the test used to assess nociception, but not the stimulus intensity, can have a dramatic effect on morphine potency. This finding shows that morphine potency varies depending on how pain is assessed.
许多测试用于评估实验动物的伤害感受。本研究的目的是比较不同测试中吗啡的效力。给大鼠注射生理盐水或吗啡(1 - 20毫克/千克,皮下注射),并在15 - 20分钟后评估伤害感受。采用抗伤害感受的一致定义——反应变化大于生理盐水处理对照组平均值以上4倍标准差——来比较吗啡在不同测试中的效力。这些数据揭示了四点。1)吗啡效力在爪压、热板和甩尾测试中最大,在福尔马林测试中最低。2)刺激强度对热板测试(49℃、52℃和55℃测试的半数有效剂量分别为4.5、2.8和2.6毫克/千克)或甩尾测试(48℃和52℃水刺激的半数有效剂量分别为2.9和2.6)中吗啡的效力没有影响。3)与采用组间设计收集的数据相比,使用组内累积给药程序评估吗啡效力导致更低的半数有效剂量值(热板:2.6对4.9;甩尾:2.6 - 2.9对5.7毫克/千克)。4)将临界值从高于平均值4个标准差调整为5、6、7和8个标准差导致半数有效剂量值逐渐增加。这些数据表明,即使所有其他因素(如物种、品系、年龄、性别和临界值)保持不变,吗啡的效力部分取决于伤害感受测试。
吗啡阻断伤害感受的能力受多种因素影响。本研究表明,用于评估伤害感受的测试而非刺激强度可对吗啡效力产生显著影响。这一发现表明,吗啡效力因疼痛评估方式而异。