• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A prospective trial comparing oocyte donor ovarian response and recipient pregnancy rates between suppression with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) alone and dual suppression with a contraceptive vaginal ring and GnRH.

作者信息

Martínez F, Boada M, Coroleu B, Clua E, Parera N, Rodríguez I, Barri P N

机构信息

Servicio de Medicina de la Reproducción, Institut Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2006 Aug;21(8):2121-5. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del121. Epub 2006 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1093/humrep/del121
PMID:16632462
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Contraceptive treatment before gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist administration presents advantages in women with a tendency to hyper-response and simplifies donor-recipient treatment synchronization. This study compares response to gonadotrophin stimulation under hypophyseal suppression in oocyte donors with or without vaginal contraceptive pretreatment.

METHODS

One hundred and ninety oocyte donors were recruited in a single centre and prospectively assigned to one of two treatment groups, according to the day of the week menstruation initiated: Group VC-, no prior vaginal contraceptive and Group VC+, prior vaginal contraceptive.

RESULTS

VC+ patients presented a significantly higher cancellation rate, lower plasma estradiol levels and fewer follicles >12 mm on the day of hCG, versus the VC- group. Number of oocytes recovered was significantly lower in the VC+ group. All the cases of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (SOHSS) were in the VC- group. Pregnancy rates by embryo transfer to synchronic recipients were similar between VC+ and VC- (59.5 versus 57.9%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Vaginal contraceptive pretreatment resulted in a higher ovarian suppression, whereas SOHSS rate was lower than in donors who did not receive pretreatment. There were no differences in pregnancy rates between the two groups of synchronic oocyte recipients.

摘要

相似文献

1
A prospective trial comparing oocyte donor ovarian response and recipient pregnancy rates between suppression with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) alone and dual suppression with a contraceptive vaginal ring and GnRH.
Hum Reprod. 2006 Aug;21(8):2121-5. doi: 10.1093/humrep/del121. Epub 2006 Apr 21.
2
Short coasting of 1 or 2 days by withholding both gonadotropins and gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist prevents ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome without compromising the outcome.通过停用促性腺激素和促性腺激素释放激素激动剂进行1至2天的短暂减药,可预防卵巢过度刺激综合征,且不影响治疗效果。
Fertil Steril. 2008 Dec;90(6):2172-8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.10.033. Epub 2008 Apr 25.
3
No room for cancellation, coasting, or ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in oocyte donation cycles.在卵子捐赠周期中,不存在取消、敷衍了事或卵巢过度刺激综合征的情况。
Fertil Steril. 2009 Apr;91(4 Suppl):1358-61. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.03.077. Epub 2008 Jun 13.
4
Triggering with HCG or GnRH agonist in GnRH antagonist treated oocyte donation cycles: a randomised clinical trial.在促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)拮抗剂治疗的卵母细胞捐赠周期中使用人绒毛膜促性腺激素(HCG)或GnRH激动剂触发排卵:一项随机临床试验。
Gynecol Endocrinol. 2009 Jan;25(1):60-6. doi: 10.1080/09513590802404013.
5
Triggering ovulation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists does not compromise embryo implantation rates.使用促性腺激素释放激素激动剂触发排卵不会影响胚胎着床率。
Fertil Steril. 2006 Dec;86(6):1682-7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.05.049. Epub 2006 Oct 30.
6
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome prevention strategies: oral contraceptive pills-dual gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist suppression with step-down gonadotropin protocols.卵巢过度刺激综合征预防策略:口服避孕药-双重促性腺激素释放激素激动剂抑制与逐步下调促性腺激素方案。
Semin Reprod Med. 2010 Nov;28(6):468-74. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1265673. Epub 2010 Nov 16.
7
A randomized controlled trial of increasing recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone after initiating a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist for in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.一项关于在启动促性腺激素释放激素拮抗剂后增加重组促卵泡激素用于体外受精-胚胎移植的随机对照试验。
Fertil Steril. 2006 Jul;86(1):58-63. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.12.040. Epub 2006 Jun 6.
8
Early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is completely prevented by gonadotropin releasing-hormone agonist triggering in high-risk oocyte donor cycles: a prospective, luteal-phase follow-up study.促性腺激素释放激素激动剂触发在高危卵母细胞供体周期中可完全预防早发性卵巢过度刺激综合征:一项前瞻性黄体期随访研究。
Fertil Steril. 2010 May 1;93(7):2418-20. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.08.036. Epub 2009 Oct 2.
9
Comparison of GnRH antagonists and flareup GnRH agonists in donor oocyte cycles.GnRH拮抗剂与激发性GnRH激动剂在供卵周期中的比较。
J Reprod Med. 2008 Mar;53(3):147-50.
10
GnRH agonist long protocol vs. a single 3-mg gnRH antagonist: a comparison of 2 protocols for pituitary down-regulation in oocyte donor-controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles.促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)激动剂长方案与单次3毫克GnRH拮抗剂方案的比较:两种垂体降调节方案在卵母细胞捐赠者控制性卵巢过度刺激周期中的比较
J Reprod Med. 2008 May;53(5):331-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of LH/FSH deficiency among assisted reproduction specialists in Spain: a Delphi consensus.西班牙辅助生殖专家对促黄体生成素/促卵泡生成素缺乏症的管理:德尔菲共识
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 5;16:1498062. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1498062. eCollection 2025.
2
Oral contraceptive pill, progestogen or oestrogen pretreatment for ovarian stimulation protocols for women undergoing assisted reproductive techniques.口服避孕药、孕激素或雌激素预处理用于接受辅助生殖技术的女性的卵巢刺激方案。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 25;5(5):CD006109. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006109.pub3.