Burrow R, Pinchbeck G
Small Animal Hospital, Department of Veterinary Clinical Science, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool L7 7EX.
Vet Rec. 2006 Apr 22;158(16):558-61. doi: 10.1136/vr.158.16.558.
Surgical gloves were collected after 231 first opinion and referral surgical procedures performed at the University of Liverpool Small Animal Hospital. They were tested for defects by the water load test and the site of any defects was recorded; 10.2 per cent of the gloves had defects, and at least one glove became defective during 51 (22.1 per cent) of the surgical procedures. Significantly more defects occurred during orthopaedic procedures and the likelihood of a defect occurring increased with the duration of the surgical procedure. The majority (78 per cent) of the defects occurred in the gloves worn on the non-dominant hand and 64 per cent of them were in the index finger. The surgeon or assistant was aware of a glove being punctured in only 3.8 per cent of cases.
在利物浦大学小动物医院进行的231例初次诊断和转诊手术操作后收集了手术手套。通过水负荷试验检测手套是否有缺陷,并记录任何缺陷的位置;10.2%的手套有缺陷,并且在51例(22.1%)手术操作过程中至少有一只手套出现缺陷。骨科手术过程中出现的缺陷明显更多,并且随着手术时间的延长,出现缺陷的可能性增加。大多数(78%)缺陷出现在非优势手佩戴的手套上,其中64%位于食指。只有3.8%的情况下外科医生或助手意识到手套被刺破。