Cook Deborah, Rocker Graeme, Marshall John, Griffith Lauren, McDonald Ellen, Guyatt Gordon
Department of Medicine,McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, CA.
Am J Crit Care. 2006 May;15(3):269-79.
A multidisciplinary research program on levels of care was conducted in 15 adult intensive care units in North America, Europe, and Australia. The program addressed advance directives for cardiopulmonary resuscitation, provision of advanced life support, and clinicians' discomfort with evolving treatment plans. The results indicated that the factors that determined the establishment of directives for advance life support differed from the factors that informed a decision to limit or withdraw support after admission to an intensive care unit. In addition, clinicians' prognoses were imprecise and often an underestimation of the probability of short-term survival. Finally, some degree of discomfort was common in care providers in the intensive care unit, most often because they thought interventions were excessive and not compatible with an acceptable future quality of life. The provision of advanced life support mandates explicit decision making about how life-support measures should be used.
北美、欧洲和澳大利亚的15个成人重症监护病房开展了一项关于护理水平的多学科研究项目。该项目涉及心肺复苏的预先指示、高级生命支持的提供以及临床医生对不断变化的治疗方案的不适。结果表明,决定制定高级生命支持指示的因素与重症监护病房入院后决定限制或停止支持的因素不同。此外,临床医生的预后不准确,往往低估了短期生存的可能性。最后,重症监护病房的护理人员普遍存在一定程度的不适,最常见的原因是他们认为干预措施过多,且与可接受的未来生活质量不相符。提供高级生命支持要求就应如何使用生命支持措施做出明确决策。