Bailey Peter L, Whitaker Emmett E, Palmer Linda S, Glance Laurent G
Department of Anesthesiology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA.
Anesth Analg. 2006 May;102(5):1327-32. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000202467.10465.12.
We simulated needle paths based on the central landmark used for central venous catheterization of the internal jugular vein. We obtained ultrasound images to quantify the landmark's accuracy (precision and bias) in 107 subjects placed in Trendelenburg position with their heads turned 30-35 degrees. We also determined the frequency of simulated carotid artery puncture. The simulated needle path missed the middle 80% of the lumen of the internal jugular vein in 34% of subjects (95% confidence interval [CI], 25% to 44%) and traversed the carotid artery in 26% of subjects (95% CI, 18% to 35%). Both events occurred in 20% of subjects (95% CI, 13%-29%). The landmark had a medial bias of 3.7 mm (95% CI, 2.7 to 4.8); it was more often (77 of 104 subjects) medial to the center of the right internal jugular vein (P < 0.001). The landmark was more likely to miss the internal jugular vein (odds ratio, 3.11; P < 0.016) and intersect the carotid (odds ratio, 3.03; P < 0.024) in obese patients. The central landmark should not be expected to yield frequent success on first needle pass without risk of carotid puncture because of its imprecision and bias. The measured bias should be considered when the central landmark is used for central venous catheterization.
我们基于用于颈内静脉中心静脉置管的中心标志模拟了穿刺路径。我们获取了超声图像,以量化107例处于头低脚高位且头部转动30 - 35度的受试者中该标志的准确性(精度和偏差)。我们还确定了模拟颈动脉穿刺的频率。在34%的受试者中(95%置信区间[CI],25%至44%),模拟穿刺路径未命中颈内静脉管腔中间80%的部分,在26%的受试者中(95% CI,18%至35%)穿刺路径穿过了颈动脉。这两种情况在20%的受试者中同时出现(95% CI,13% - 29%)。该标志存在3.7毫米的内侧偏差(95% CI,2.7至4.8);在104例受试者中,它更常位于右侧颈内静脉中心的内侧(77例,P < 0.001)。在肥胖患者中,该标志更有可能错过颈内静脉(优势比,3.11;P < 0.016)并与颈动脉相交(优势比,3.03;P < 0.024)。由于其不精确性和偏差,不应期望该中心标志在首次穿刺时就能频繁成功且无颈动脉穿刺风险。在将该中心标志用于中心静脉置管时,应考虑所测量的偏差。