Suppr超能文献

一项为期24周的随机研究,比较奥氮平与齐拉西酮治疗伴有显著抑郁症状的精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍患者的疗效。

A 24-week randomized study of olanzapine versus ziprasidone in the treatment of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder in patients with prominent depressive symptoms.

作者信息

Kinon Bruce J, Lipkovich Ilya, Edwards S Beth, Adams David H, Ascher-Svanum Haya, Siris Samuel G

机构信息

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Apr;26(2):157-62. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000204137.82298.06.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to compare olanzapine with ziprasidone therapy in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and experiencing depressive symptoms.

METHODS

This randomized, double-blind, 24-week, fixed-dose study compared olanzapine (n = 202) and ziprasidone (n = 192) for patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and experiencing prominent depressive symptoms. Outcome measures included change in Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) score from baseline to 8 weeks (primary outcome) and changes in CDSS, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scales, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale, and Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scores for 24 weeks. Statistical analyses included mixed-effects model repeated measures (primary analysis) and change from baseline to last observation carried forward (LOCF).

RESULTS

At baseline, patients had moderate depressive symptoms (mean Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scales total score, 27.3). For 8 weeks, patients treated with olanzapine or ziprasidone had significant improvements on CDSS. Treatment group differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.493, mixed-effects model repeated measures; P = 0.497, LOCF). For 24 weeks, olanzapine-treated patients showed significantly greater improvements in depressive symptoms (results varied by depression measure and statistical approach) and GAF (P < 0.017, LOCF). A significantly higher proportion of olanzapine-treated patients completed the study (44.6% vs 29.7%; P = 0.003) and remained longer on medication (median, 163 vs 73 days, P < 0.001), compared with ziprasidone-treated patients. Olanzapine-treated patients experienced significantly (P < 0.05) greater increases in triglycerides, HgbA1c, and weight.

CONCLUSIONS

For 24 weeks, olanzapine-treated patients had greater and more sustained participation in treatment, during which time significantly greater improvements were observed in depressive symptoms and GAF scores, along with increases in weight and certain metabolic parameters as compared with ziprasidone-treated patients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较奥氮平与齐拉西酮治疗伴有抑郁症状的精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍患者的疗效。

方法

本随机、双盲、为期24周的固定剂量研究,比较了奥氮平(n = 202)与齐拉西酮(n = 192)治疗伴有明显抑郁症状的精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍患者的疗效。疗效指标包括从基线到8周时精神分裂症卡尔加里抑郁量表(CDSS)评分的变化(主要指标)以及24周时CDSS、蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表、阳性和阴性症状量表及总体功能评定量表(GAF)评分的变化。统计分析包括混合效应模型重复测量(主要分析)以及从基线到末次观察结转(LOCF)。

结果

基线时,患者有中度抑郁症状(蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表总分均值为27.3)。在8周时,接受奥氮平或齐拉西酮治疗的患者在CDSS上有显著改善。治疗组间差异无统计学意义(P = 0.493,混合效应模型重复测量;P = 0.497,LOCF)。在24周时,奥氮平治疗的患者在抑郁症状(结果因抑郁测量方法和统计方法而异)和GAF方面有显著更大的改善(P < 0.017,LOCF)。与接受齐拉西酮治疗的患者相比,接受奥氮平治疗的患者完成研究的比例显著更高(44.6%对29.7%;P = 0.003)且用药时间更长(中位数,163天对73天,P < 0.001)。接受奥氮平治疗的患者甘油三酯、糖化血红蛋白和体重的增加显著更大(P < 0.05)。

结论

在24周时,与接受齐拉西酮治疗的患者相比,接受奥氮平治疗的患者对治疗的参与度更高且更持久,在此期间抑郁症状和GAF评分有显著更大的改善,同时体重和某些代谢参数增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验