Lindenmayer Jean-Pierre, Kaur Amandeep
Psychopharmacology Research Department, Manhattan Psychiatric Center, Ward's Island, NY, 10035, USA.
New York University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Drugs. 2016 Apr;76(5):589-604. doi: 10.1007/s40265-016-0551-x.
Schizoaffective disorder (SAD) is an incapacitating illness that presents clinicians with challenges in terms of both its diagnosis and its psychopharmacological management. Most studies conducted on the psychopharmacological treatment of SAD also include patients with schizophrenia or other psychotic illnesses, thereby providing an unspecific view to the clinician as to the best way of treating patients with SAD. The objective of this article is to review studies on evidence-based treatment of patients with SAD. We conducted a systematic literature search in MEDLINE/PubMed for full-text studies in the English language using the terms 'Schizoaffective and treatment' or 'antipsychotic schizoaffective'. Our review found relatively few studies with either an active comparator or placebo that examined the efficacy of antipsychotics for patients with SAD without an admixture of patients with schizophrenia. Only oral paliperidone extended release (ER), paliperidone long-acting injection (LAI), and risperidone have been shown to be effective and safe in reducing psychotic as well as affective components in acutely ill SAD patients in controlled studies. Paliperidone ER and LAI have also been shown to be efficacious in the maintenance treatment phase of SAD patients. While no supportive data exist, it is possible that other atypical antipsychotics may have similar efficacy to the two mentioned above. We conclude with a number of research recommendations for the study of treatment options for patients with SAD. First, there is a need for studies with patients specifically diagnosed with SAD for both the acute and the maintenance phase. The sample size needs to be adequate to allow a primary analysis of efficacy and to allow for analysis of the SAD subtypes: depressed and bipolar. Another recommendation is the need for studies of patients with SAD stratified into patients with and without mood stabilizers or antidepressants to allow the examination of the adjunctive role of these psychotropic medications. A third recommendation is to focus on specific co-morbid aspects of patients with SAD, such as suicidality and substance use disorders. Data from such studies will fill the gap of evidence-based treatment approaches and help clinicians in making important treatment decisions for patients with this complex condition.
分裂情感性障碍(SAD)是一种使人丧失能力的疾病,在诊断和心理药物治疗方面都给临床医生带来了挑战。大多数关于SAD心理药物治疗的研究也纳入了精神分裂症或其他精神病性疾病患者,因此,对于临床医生而言,这无法提供关于治疗SAD患者的最佳方法的具体观点。本文的目的是回顾关于SAD患者循证治疗的研究。我们在MEDLINE/PubMed中进行了系统的文献检索,以搜索使用 “分裂情感性障碍与治疗” 或 “抗精神病药 分裂情感性障碍” 等术语的英文全文研究。我们的综述发现,相对较少有研究使用活性对照药或安慰剂来检验抗精神病药对无精神分裂症患者混杂的SAD患者的疗效。在对照研究中,仅口服缓释帕利哌酮(ER)、帕利哌酮长效注射剂(LAI)和利培酮已被证明在减轻急性病SAD患者的精神病性及情感性成分方面有效且安全。帕利哌酮ER和LAI在SAD患者的维持治疗阶段也已显示出疗效。虽然没有支持性数据,但其他非典型抗精神病药可能具有与上述两种药物相似的疗效。我们最后针对SAD患者治疗方案的研究提出了一些建议。首先,需要针对急性和维持期专门诊断为SAD的患者开展研究。样本量需要足够,以便对疗效进行初步分析,并能够分析SAD的亚型:抑郁型和双相型。另一个建议是,需要对SAD患者进行分层研究,分为使用和未使用心境稳定剂或抗抑郁药的患者组,以便检验这些精神药物的辅助作用。第三个建议是关注SAD患者的特定共病方面,如自杀倾向和物质使用障碍。这些研究的数据将填补循证治疗方法的空白,并帮助临床医生为患有这种复杂疾病的患者做出重要的治疗决策。