Roessink I, Belgers J D M, Crum S J H, van den Brink P J, Brock T C M
Alterra, Wageningen UR, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Ecotoxicology. 2006 Jul;15(5):411-24. doi: 10.1007/s10646-006-0063-7.
The study objectives were to shed light on the types of freshwater organism that are sensitive to triphenyltin acetate (TPT) and to compare the laboratory and microcosm sensitivities of the invertebrate community. The responses of a wide array of freshwater taxa (including invertebrates, phytoplankton and macrophytes) from acute laboratory Single Species Tests (SST) were compared with the concentration-response relationships of aquatic populations in two types of freshwater microcosms. Representatives of several taxonomic groups of invertebrates, and several phytoplankton and vascular plant species proved to be sensitive to TPT, illustrating its diverse modes of toxic action. Statistically calculated ecological risk thresholds (HC5 values) based on 96 h laboratory EC50 values for invertebrates were 1.3 microg/l, while these values on the basis of microcosm-Species Sensitivity Distributions (SSD) for invertebrates in sampling weeks 2-8 after TPT treatment ranged from 0.2 to 0.6 microg/l based on nominal peak concentrations. Responses observed in the microcosms did not differ between system types and sampling dates, indicating that ecological threshold levels are not affected by different community structures including taxa sensitive to TPT. The laboratory-derived invertebrate SSD curve was less sensitive than the curves from the microcosms. Possible explanations for the more sensitive field response are delayed effects and/or additional chronic exposure via the food chain in the microcosms.
该研究的目的是阐明对醋酸三苯基锡(TPT)敏感的淡水生物类型,并比较无脊椎动物群落的实验室敏感性和微观世界敏感性。将急性实验室单物种试验(SST)中多种淡水分类群(包括无脊椎动物、浮游植物和大型植物)的反应,与两种淡水微观世界中水生生物种群的浓度-反应关系进行了比较。几个无脊椎动物分类群的代表,以及几种浮游植物和维管植物物种被证明对TPT敏感,说明了其多样的毒性作用模式。根据无脊椎动物96小时实验室半数有效浓度(EC50)值统计计算出的生态风险阈值(HC5值)为1.3微克/升,而基于TPT处理后第2至8周采样周无脊椎动物微观世界物种敏感性分布(SSD)的这些值,基于名义峰值浓度范围为0.2至0.6微克/升。在微观世界中观察到的反应在系统类型和采样日期之间没有差异,表明生态阈值水平不受包括对TPT敏感的分类群在内的不同群落结构的影响。实验室得出的无脊椎动物SSD曲线比微观世界的曲线敏感性更低。对更敏感的现场反应的可能解释是延迟效应和/或微观世界中通过食物链的额外慢性暴露。