Crowe D Ralph, Eloubeidi Mohamad A, Chhieng David C, Jhala Nirag C, Jhala Darshana, Eltoum Isam A
Division of Anatomic Pathology, Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35233, USA.
Cancer. 2006 Jun 25;108(3):180-5. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21912.
Computerized tomographic (CT)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is a well-established tool in the diagnosis of hepatic lesions. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA (EUS-FNA), developed recently and used predominantly in evaluating mediastinal and pancreatic lesions, provides access to a significant portion of the liver and to perihepatic structures not readily accessible by a percutaneous approach.
A recent experience (1997-2002) with CT-guided FNA of liver lesions at the University of Alabama Birmingham (UAB) was compared with the first 2.5 years of EUS-FNA experience (2000-2002). Cases were identified using a SNOMED search and all reports and cytologic slides were retrieved for review.
In 6 years, 34 percutaneous CT-FNA liver biopsies were performed at UAB; in approximately 2.5 years, 16 EUS-FNA liver biopsies were done. In both groups the primary clinical indication was suspected metastatic carcinoma (CT, 41% of cases vs. EUS, 56%). The 2 techniques yielded a similar range of benign, atypical, and malignant diagnoses (CT: 26%, 18%, and 56% vs. EUS: 19%, 25%, and 56%). Because of the clinical setting in which EUS-FNA is usually performed, a much narrower range of neoplasms was sampled by EUS-FNA. Benign gastrointestinal epithelial cells were identified in 60% of the EUS-FNA specimens.
Early experience suggests EUS-FNA is comparable to CT-FNA in terms of diagnostic utility for hepatic lesions. Anatomy limits EUS-FNA to only a fraction of the hepatic parenchyma, but that fraction includes the hilum and left lobe of the liver and the proximal biliary tract. The gallbladder, extrahepatic biliary system, and perihilar lymph nodes are readily accessible. Proximate high-resolution ultrasound imaging and cytopathologist involvement in the EUS-FNA process are further advantages. Awareness of artifacts inherent in EUS-FNA sampling (i.e., gut epithelial cells) can minimize a potential diagnostic pitfall.
计算机断层扫描(CT)引导下细针穿刺(FNA)细胞学检查是诊断肝脏病变的一项成熟技术。内镜超声引导下FNA(EUS-FNA)是最近开发的,主要用于评估纵隔和胰腺病变,它能够对很大一部分肝脏以及经皮穿刺不易到达的肝周结构进行检查。
将阿拉巴马大学伯明翰分校(UAB)最近(1997 - 2002年)CT引导下肝脏病变FNA的经验与最初2.5年EUS-FNA的经验(2000 - 2002年)进行比较。通过系统化医学术语(SNOMED)检索确定病例,并检索所有报告和细胞学玻片进行回顾。
6年间,UAB进行了34例经皮CT-FNA肝脏活检;在大约2.5年的时间里,进行了16例EUS-FNA肝脏活检。两组的主要临床指征均为疑似转移性癌(CT组为41%的病例,EUS组为56%)。两种技术在良性、非典型和恶性诊断方面的结果范围相似(CT组:26%、18%和56%,EUS组:19%、25%和56%)。由于EUS-FNA通常在的临床环境下进行,EUS-FNA所取材的肿瘤范围要窄得多。在60%的EUS-FNA标本中发现了良性胃肠道上皮细胞。
早期经验表明,EUS-FNA在肝脏病变的诊断效用方面与CT-FNA相当。解剖结构限制了EUS-FNA只能取材于部分肝实质,但这部分包括肝门、肝左叶和近端胆道。胆囊、肝外胆道系统和肝门周围淋巴结易于到达。近距离高分辨率超声成像以及细胞病理学家参与EUS-FNA过程是进一步的优势。了解EUS-FNA取材中固有的假象(即肠道上皮细胞)可将潜在的诊断陷阱降至最低。