Suppr超能文献

高危癌症手术中的护理量与护理流程

Volume and process of care in high-risk cancer surgery.

作者信息

Birkmeyer John D, Sun Yating, Goldfaden Aaron, Birkmeyer Nancy J O, Stukel Therese A

机构信息

Michigan Surgical Collaborative for Outcomes Research and Evaluation (M-SCORE), Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2006 Jun 1;106(11):2476-81. doi: 10.1002/cncr.21888.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although relations between procedure volume and operative mortality are well established for high-risk cancer operations, differences in clinical practice between high-volume and low-volume centers are not well understood. The current study was conducted to examine relations between hospital volume, process of care, and operative mortality in cancer surgery.

METHODS

Using the Medicare claims database (2000-2002), we identified all patients undergoing major resections for lung, esophageal, gastric, liver, or pancreatic cancer (n=71,558). Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative processes of care potentially related to operative mortality were identified from inpatient, outpatient, and physician claims files using appropriate International Classification of Diseases--Clinical Modification (ICD-9) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. We then assessed variation in the use of each process according to hospital volume, adjusting for patient characteristics and procedure type. Study Participants were US Medicare patients. The main outcome measure was specific processes of care.

RESULTS

Relative to those at low-volume centers (lowest 20th by volume), patients at high-volume hospitals (highest 20th) were significantly more likely to undergo stress tests (odds ratio [OR]: 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.21-1.87), but not other preoperative imaging tests. They were more likely to see medical or radiation oncologists (OR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.16-1.62), but not other specialists, preoperatively. Although blood transfusions and use of epidural pain management did not vary significantly by volume, patients at high-volume hospitals had significantly longer operations and were more likely to receive perioperative invasive monitoring (OR: 2.56, 95% CI: 1.82-3.60). Differences in measurable processes of care did not explain volume-related differences in operative mortality to any significant degree.

CONCLUSIONS

Although high-volume and low-volume hospitals differ with regard to many aspects of perioperative care, mechanisms underlying volume-outcome relations in high-risk cancer surgery remain to be identified.

摘要

背景

尽管高风险癌症手术中手术量与手术死亡率之间的关系已得到充分证实,但高手术量中心与低手术量中心在临床实践方面的差异尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨癌症手术中医院手术量、医疗过程与手术死亡率之间的关系。

方法

利用医疗保险索赔数据库(2000 - 2002年),我们确定了所有接受肺、食管、胃、肝或胰腺癌大手术的患者(n = 71,558)。使用适当的国际疾病分类临床修订版(ICD - 9)和现行手术操作术语(CPT)编码,从住院、门诊和医生索赔文件中确定可能与手术死亡率相关的术前、术中和术后医疗过程。然后,我们根据医院手术量评估每个医疗过程的使用差异,并对患者特征和手术类型进行调整。研究参与者为美国医疗保险患者。主要结局指标是特定的医疗过程。

结果

与低手术量中心(手术量最低的20%)的患者相比,高手术量医院(手术量最高的20%)的患者接受压力测试的可能性显著更高(比值比[OR]:1.51,95%置信区间[CI]:1.21 - 1.87),但其他术前影像学检查并非如此。他们在术前看医学或放射肿瘤学家的可能性更高(OR:1.37,95% CI:1.16 - 1.62),但看其他专科医生的可能性并非如此。尽管输血和硬膜外疼痛管理的使用在手术量方面没有显著差异,但高手术量医院的患者手术时间显著更长,且更有可能接受围手术期侵入性监测(OR:2.56,95% CI:1.82 - 3.60)。可测量的医疗过程差异在很大程度上并不能解释手术量与手术死亡率之间的差异。

结论

尽管高手术量医院和低手术量医院在围手术期护理的许多方面存在差异,但高风险癌症手术中手术量与结局关系的潜在机制仍有待确定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验