Brogårdh Christina, Sjölund Bengt H
Rehabilitation Medicine, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Clin Rehabil. 2006 Mar;20(3):218-27. doi: 10.1191/0269215506cr937oa.
(1) To evaluate constraint-induced movement therapy for chronic stroke patients modified into group practice to limit the demand on therapist resources. (2) To explore whether extended mitt use alone may enhance outcome.
A combined case-control and randomized controlled study with pre- and post-treatment measures by blinded observers.
A university hospital rehabilitation department.
Sixteen stroke patients (nine men and seven women; mean age 56.7 years; on average 28.9 months post stroke, five of whom were 6-9 months post stroke) with moderate motor impairments in the contralateral upper limb.
Constraint-induced therapy (mitt on the less affected hand 90% of waking hours for 12 days) with 2-3 patients per therapist and 6 h of group training per day. After the training period, the patients were randomized either to using the mitt at home every other day for two-week periods for another three months (in total 21 days) or to no further treatment.
Modified Motor Assessment Scale, Sollerman Hand Function Test, Two-Point Discrimination test and Motor Activity Log.
The mean motor performance improved significantly after two weeks of constraint-induced group therapy on Motor Assessment Scale (1.44 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.59-2.28) points; P = 0.003) and on Sollerman Hand Function Test (3.81 (95% CI 0.26-7.36) points; P = 0.037) but showed no sensory change in the Two-Point Discrimination Test (P = 0.283). The median difference in self-reported motor ability (Motor Activity Log) also improved (P < 0.001). However, no additional effect was seen from wearing a mitt for another three months.
Constraint-induced group therapy, allowing several patients per therapist, seems to be a feasible alternative to improve upper limb motor function. The restraint alone, extended in time, did not enhance the treatment effect.
(1)评估将限制使用疗法应用于慢性中风患者并改为小组治疗模式,以减少对治疗师资源的需求。(2)探讨仅延长使用连指手套是否可改善治疗效果。
一项结合病例对照和随机对照的研究,由盲法观察者进行治疗前和治疗后的测量。
一家大学医院的康复科。
16名中风患者(9名男性和7名女性;平均年龄56.7岁;中风后平均28.9个月,其中5名患者处于中风后6 - 9个月),对侧上肢有中度运动障碍。
限制使用疗法(清醒时间的90%将连指手套戴在患侧较轻的手上,持续12天),每位治疗师负责2 - 3名患者,每天进行6小时的小组训练。训练期结束后,患者被随机分为两组,一组在接下来的三个月里每隔一天在家中使用连指手套两周(共21天),另一组不再接受进一步治疗。
改良运动评估量表(Modified Motor Assessment Scale)、索勒曼手功能测试(Sollerman Hand Function Test)、两点辨别试验(Two-Point Discrimination test)和运动活动日志(Motor Activity Log)。
在限制使用疗法小组治疗两周后,改良运动评估量表(平均提高1.44分(95%置信区间(95% CI)0.59 - 2.28);P = 0.003)和索勒曼手功能测试(平均提高3.81分(95% CI 0.26 - 7.36);P = 0.037)显示运动表现显著改善,但两点辨别试验未显示感觉变化(P = 0.283)。自我报告的运动能力(运动活动日志)的中位数差异也有所改善(P < 0.001)。然而,在接下来的三个月里继续佩戴连指手套并未产生额外效果。
限制使用疗法小组治疗,即每位治疗师负责多名患者,似乎是改善上肢运动功能的一种可行替代方法。仅延长使用限制时间并不能增强治疗效果。