DeHaven-Hudkins D L, Hildebrand L M, Fleissner L C, Ward S J
Department of Enzymology and Receptor Biochemistry, Sterling Research Group, Malvern, PA 19355.
Eur J Pharmacol. 1991 Oct 22;203(3):329-35. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(91)90887-v.
The existence of sigma receptors in the mouse, rat and guinea pig vasa deferentia has previously been proposed, although drug effects are inconsistent and generally occur only at high concentrations. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate lower, physiologically relevant concentrations of ligands for possible sigma effects on electrically stimulated twitch contractions in the mouse vas deferens (MVD). Putative sigma agonists and antagonists all inhibited 0.1 Hz electrically stimulated twitch contractions in nM concentrations. Inhibitory activity plateaued between 20 and 60% for all compounds except 1,3-di(2-tolyl)guanidine (DTG), which had a shallow concentration-effect curve. Subsequent to the plateau, higher concentrations (30 microM) of rimcazole and haloperidol fully inhibited electrically stimulated twitch contractions. There was no correlation between inhibitory potency or maximal effect in the MVD and binding potency at sigma sites in either MVD or guinea pig brain. The inhibitory effects of R(+)-3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-1-propylpiperidine ((+)3-PPP) or DTG on electrically stimulated twitch contractions were not antagonized by the putative sigma antagonists DTG, haloperidol, rimcazole or BMY-14802, nor by alpha 2-adrenoceptor, dopamine D1, dopamine D2 or opiate antagonists. Although the mechanism of sigma ligand effects in the MVD has not been established, the data caution against a presumption that effects of sigma ligands on electrically stimulated twitch contractions in this preparation are mediated by sigma receptors.
先前有人提出在小鼠、大鼠和豚鼠的输精管中存在σ受体,尽管药物效应并不一致,且通常仅在高浓度时才会出现。本研究的目的是评估较低的、与生理相关浓度的配体,以探讨其对小鼠输精管(MVD)电刺激抽搐收缩可能产生的σ效应。假定的σ激动剂和拮抗剂在纳摩尔浓度下均能抑制0.1Hz电刺激抽搐收缩。除1,3 - 二(2 - 甲苯基)胍(DTG)外,所有化合物的抑制活性在20%至60%之间达到平稳状态,DTG的浓度 - 效应曲线较平缓。在达到平稳状态后,较高浓度(30μM)的利莫唑和氟哌啶醇可完全抑制电刺激抽搐收缩。MVD中的抑制效力或最大效应与MVD或豚鼠脑中σ位点的结合效力之间没有相关性。R(+) - 3 - (3 - 羟苯基) - N - 1 - 丙基哌啶((+)3 - PPP)或DTG对电刺激抽搐收缩的抑制作用,既不能被假定的σ拮抗剂DTG、氟哌啶醇、利莫唑或BMY - 14802拮抗,也不能被α2 - 肾上腺素能受体、多巴胺D1、多巴胺D2或阿片类拮抗剂拮抗。尽管尚未确定σ配体在MVD中的作用机制,但这些数据提醒我们,不能假定该制剂中σ配体对电刺激抽搐收缩的作用是由σ受体介导的。