Fontana S, Kremer Hovinga J A, Lämmle B, Mansouri Taleghani B
Department of Haematology and Central Haematology Laboratory, University Hospital, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.
Vox Sang. 2006 May;90(4):245-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1423-0410.2006.00747.x.
Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), characterized by thrombocytopenia and microangiopathic haemolytic anaemia, was almost universally fatal until the introduction of plasma exchange (PE) therapy in the 1970s. Based on clinical studies, daily PE has become the first-choice therapy since 1991. Recent findings may explain its effectiveness, which may include, in particular, the removal of anti-ADAMTS13 autoantibodies and unusually large von Willebrand factor multimers and/or supply of ADAMTS13 in acquired idiopathic or congenital TTP. Based on currently available data, the favoured PE regimen is daily PE [involving replacement of 1-1.5 times the patient's plasma volume with fresh-frozen plasma (FFP)] until remission. Adverse events of treatment are mainly related to central venous catheters. The potential reduction of plasma related side-effects, such as transfusion-related acute lung injury (TRALI) or febrile transfusion reactions by use of solvent-detergent treated (S/D) plasma instead of FFP is not established by controlled clinical studies. Uncontrolled clinical observations and the hypothesis of an autoimmune process in a significant part of the patients with acquired idiopathic TTP suggest a beneficial effect of adjunctive therapy with corticosteroids. Other immunosuppressive treatments are not tested in controlled trials and should be reserved for refractory or relapsing disease. There is no convincing evidence for the use of antiplatelet agents. Supportive treatment with transfusion of red blood cells or platelets has to be evaluated on a clinical basis, but the transfusion trigger for platelets should be very restrictive. Further controlled, prospective studies should consider the different pathophysiological features of thrombotic microangiopathies, address the prognostic significance of ADAMTS13 and explore alternative exchange fluids to FFP, the role of immunosuppressive therapies and of new plasma saving approaches as recombinant ADAMTS13 and protein A immunoadsorption.
血栓性血小板减少性紫癜(TTP)的特征为血小板减少和微血管病性溶血性贫血,在20世纪70年代引入血浆置换(PE)治疗之前几乎无一幸免。基于临床研究,自1991年起每日血浆置换已成为首选治疗方法。近期研究结果或许能解释其有效性,这尤其可能包括清除抗ADAMTS13自身抗体以及超大血管性血友病因子多聚体和/或为获得性特发性或先天性TTP补充ADAMTS13。基于现有数据,推荐的血浆置换方案是每日进行血浆置换[即用新鲜冷冻血浆(FFP)置换患者血浆量的1 - 1.5倍]直至病情缓解。治疗的不良事件主要与中心静脉导管有关。使用经溶剂去污剂处理(S/D)的血浆而非FFP是否能潜在减少血浆相关副作用,如输血相关急性肺损伤(TRALI)或发热性输血反应,尚未得到对照临床研究的确证。非对照临床观察以及大部分获得性特发性TTP患者存在自身免疫过程的假说提示,联合使用皮质类固醇治疗可能有益。其他免疫抑制治疗方法尚未在对照试验中进行检验,应仅用于难治性或复发性疾病。目前尚无令人信服的证据支持使用抗血小板药物。红细胞或血小板输注的支持性治疗必须根据临床情况进行评估,但血小板的输注阈值应非常严格。进一步的对照前瞻性研究应考虑血栓性微血管病的不同病理生理特征,探讨ADAMTS13的预后意义,并探索替代FFP的置换液、免疫抑制治疗的作用以及新的血浆节省方法,如重组ADAMTS13和蛋白A免疫吸附。