[Influences of decellularization processes on immunogenicity of chemically acellular nerve allografts].

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the relationship between immunogenicity and decellularization processes of chemically acellular nerve allografts.

METHODS

Adult Sprague Dawley rats were used as nerve donors and adult male Wistar rats used as nerve recipient hosts. 25 mm nerve segments were excised from SD rats' sciatic nerves. The nerve segments were decellularized via an improved chemical decelluarization treatment as follows: (1) nerve segments were rinsed with cold sterile Ringer's solution; (2) stabilized by pinning the ends to a thin plastic support, and submerged in 4% Triton-100 solution 12 h; (3) soaked into 3% sodium deoxycholate for 12 h; (4) washed in distilled water for 6 h. The procedures were repeated once again. The acellular nerve allografts from SD rats were sterilized by gamma irradiation and implanted into Wistar rats subcutanously. The control group was implantation of fresh nerve allografts from SD rats. The immunogenicity of acellular nerve allograft was tested by immunohistochemical examination of the intensity of CD3(+), CD4(+) and CD8(+) cells that infiltrated the allografts. Ulnar nerve segments were obtained from forearms of dogs and decellularized according to above procedures. According as the decellularization times, The ulnar nerve segments were divided into three subgroups: in group I, group II and group III, the nerve segments were decellularized repeatedly two, three and four cycles respectively. Each ulnar nerve segment was subdivided into five portions from proximal to distal end. The degrees of decellularization, demyelination and basal lamina integrity of extracellular matrix scaffold were observed with microscope and assessed by a score system. The immunohistochemical staining of GAG was observed.

RESULTS

The intensity of CD3(+), CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells that infiltrated the allografts was greatly lower in acellular nerves than in fresh nerves. The mild cell-mediated host-graft immunorejection in acellular nerves was observed. On the decellularization procedures, the cells were completely extracted from nerves in all groups, but the myelin sheath were partially existed, and the GAG was present in the basal membrane of myelin sheath. In the score of demyelination, there were no statistical differences between groups (P > 0.05). The statistical difference of basal lamina integrity scores between group I and group II, group I and group III were significant (P < 0.05). As increasing the times of process, the degrees of disintegrity of basal lamina was significantly enhanced.

CONCLUSIONS

Although decellularization processes significantly reduce the cell-mediated immunorejection of acellular nerve allografts, it can induce mild immunoreaction all the same, the antigen that responsible for immunogenicity may be the residual component of GAG in myelin sheath.