Lee Kang-Hoe, Phua Jason, Lim Tow-Keang
Department of Medicine, National University Hospital, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074, Singapore.
Respir Med. 2006 Dec;100(12):2190-6. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.03.011. Epub 2006 Apr 25.
To perform a pharmacoeconomic analysis on the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with the addition of tiotropium bromide.
Pharmacoeconomic modeling was performed utilizing the efficacy of tiotropium bromide from the literature on different settings and severity of COPD. Reductions in exacerbations, hospitalizations, and number of exacerbation days per year were derived from these studies. Cost of drug treatment, exacerbations, hospitalization, and loss of income were derived from local data in Singapore and reported in Singapore dollars (US$1=S$1.71). A model was constructed to calculate the impact of one-year treatment with tiotropium bromide, and the results were reported for the total incremental cost per year, cost per year needed to reduce one hospitalization in one year, and cost-savings from hospitalizations in one year. Sensitivity analysis were performed for different number of patients treated per year, differing cost of hospitalization, different cost for tiotropium bromide, different impact of tiotropium bromide on clinical outcomes, and the different amount of substitution drug utilized in the comparator group.
Using the different clinical effects and looking at the impact on treating 1000, 2000, and 10,000 patients per year, most of the results showed a high level of decrease in overall cost per year that ranged from S$145.40 to S$840.37 per patient treated. Cost per year needed to reduce one hospitalization in one year ranged from S$3217.31 to S$18,148.92. Cost-savings from hospitalizations in one year per patient treated ranged from $57.16 to $322.49. This may contribute as high as 83% of the overall cost saving. Sensitivity analysis supports the cost savings finding.
Adding tiotropium bromide for severe COPD patients would lead to a significant cost savings for the economy.
对添加噻托溴铵治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)进行药物经济学分析。
利用文献中噻托溴铵在不同COPD病情及严重程度下的疗效进行药物经济学建模。从这些研究中得出每年急性加重次数、住院次数及急性加重天数的减少情况。药物治疗成本、急性加重、住院及收入损失成本来自新加坡本地数据,以新加坡元报告(1美元 = 1.71新加坡元)。构建一个模型来计算噻托溴铵一年治疗的影响,并报告每年的总增量成本、每年减少一次住院所需的成本以及一年住院节省的成本。针对每年治疗的不同患者数量、不同住院成本、噻托溴铵的不同成本、噻托溴铵对临床结局的不同影响以及对照治疗组中使用的替代药物量进行敏感性分析。
根据不同的临床效果,并观察对每年治疗1000、2000和10000名患者的影响,大多数结果显示每年总体成本有高度降低,每位接受治疗的患者降低幅度为145.40新加坡元至840.37新加坡元。每年减少一次住院所需的成本为3217.31新加坡元至18148.92新加坡元。每位接受治疗的患者一年住院节省的成本为57.16新加坡元至322.49新加坡元。这可能占总体成本节省的高达83%。敏感性分析支持成本节省的发现。
为重度COPD患者添加噻托溴铵将为经济带来显著的成本节省。