Sandler Paulo Cesar
Int J Psychoanal. 2006 Feb;87(Pt 1):180-201. doi: 10.1516/b2b4-k7cc-eexj-fpvx.
This study attempts to identify the scientific, philosophical and psychoanalytic origins of Bion's work, and includes an organization of these in a comprehensive and synthetic way with the help of a synoptic table. Investigation has revealed Bion's scientific orientation, fed by classical and modern authors--notably, Locke, Hume, Kant, Sylvester and Cayley, Poincaré, Heisenberg, and the German Romantics. Bion was able to rescue certain transcendent aspects of human, and also of Freudian, knowledge that had largely fallen into neglected obscurity. He made an original use of new verbal expressions related to the immaterial facts of psychic reality, the unconscious and the id. The method involves a search for counterparts in reality with two kinds of evidential source: some works and their authors have appeared ipsis litteris in Bion's work. In those situations where Bion does not cite the sources, the study has been able to establish connections with the lengthy marginal notes which Bion left in the texts of the books from his library.
本研究试图探寻比昂作品的科学、哲学及精神分析学渊源，并借助一览表以全面综合的方式对这些渊源加以整理。调查揭示了比昂的科学取向，其受到古典及现代作家的影响——尤其是洛克、休谟、康德、西尔维斯特和凯莱、庞加莱、海森堡以及德国浪漫主义者。比昂能够挽救人类知识以及弗洛伊德知识中某些已基本陷入被忽视的 obscurity（此处原文有误，推测可能是“obscurity”，意为晦涩难懂）的超验层面。他对与心理现实、无意识及本我的非物质事实相关的新语言表达进行了原创性运用。该方法涉及通过两种证据来源在现实中寻找对应物：一些作品及其作者直接出现在比昂的作品中。在比昂未引用出处的情况下，本研究得以通过比昂留在其藏书文本中的长篇旁注建立起联系。
