Hoffmann Ellen, Sulke Neil, Edvardsson Nils, Ruiter Jacob, Lewalter Thorsten, Capucci Alessandro, Schuchert Andreas, Janko Sabine, Camm John
Klinikum der Universität München-Grosshadern, München, Germany.
Circulation. 2006 Apr 25;113(16):1933-41. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.568568.
This study investigated onset scenarios of atrial fibrillation (AF), the first phase of the Atrial Fibrillation Therapy (AFT) trial, to determine potential arrhythmogenic triggers as targets for atrial pacing algorithms that have been proposed for prevention of AF.
Ninety-eight patients (58 men; age 65+/-11 years) with recurrent, symptomatic, drug-refractory AF and a conventional pacemaker indication in 31 of 98 received a dual-chamber pacemaker. Using novel diagnostic pacemaker features AF onset scenarios were prospectively evaluated in 612 AF episodes during a 2-month monitoring period, with atrial pacing limited to 40 bpm. The most common onset scenario was premature atrial complexes (PACs) before AF (48% onsets per patient), followed by bradycardia (33%), sudden onset (17%), and tachycardia (0%). Combinations of onset scenarios were frequent (median 2 different scenarios per patient). A main study finding was the significance of repetitive AF, with 33% of onsets per patient being initiated within 5 minutes of a previous AF episode. Sudden onsets were more frequent among patients with than without repetitive AF (24% versus 0% onsets per patient, P=0.011), whereas the proportion of PACs before AF was not statistically different (50% versus 37%, P=0.52); however, patients with repetitive AF had more PACs per hour (72 versus 29, P=0.023) and a higher number of AF episodes per day (17 versus 0, P=0.001) and were more likely to have at least 1 PAC-related onset (90% versus 53%, P<0.0001).
Novel diagnostic pacemaker features allowed a detailed individual analysis of rate and rhythm changes before AF and thus uncovered a substantial intraindividual and interindividual variability of AF onset scenarios.
本研究为心房颤动治疗(AFT)试验的第一阶段,调查了心房颤动(AF)的发作情况,以确定潜在的致心律失常触发因素,作为已提出的用于预防AF的心房起搏算法的靶点。
98例患者(58例男性;年龄65±11岁)患有复发性、症状性、药物难治性AF,98例中有31例有传统起搏器植入指征,接受了双腔起搏器植入。利用新型诊断起搏器功能,在2个月的监测期内对612次AF发作的发作情况进行前瞻性评估,心房起搏频率限制为40次/分。最常见的发作情况是AF前的房性早搏(PACs)(每位患者发作率48%),其次是心动过缓(33%)、突然发作(17%)和心动过速(0%)。发作情况的组合很常见(每位患者中位数为2种不同情况)。一项主要研究发现是重复性AF的重要性,每位患者33%的发作是在前一次AF发作后5分钟内开始的。有重复性AF的患者中突然发作比无重复性AF的患者更频繁(每位患者发作率24%对0%,P = 0.011),而AF前PACs的比例无统计学差异(50%对37%,P = 0.52);然而,有重复性AF的患者每小时的PACs更多(72对29,P = 0.023),每天的AF发作次数更多(17对0,P = 0.001),并且更有可能至少有1次与PAC相关的发作(90%对53%,P < 0.0001)。
新型诊断起搏器功能允许对AF前的心率和节律变化进行详细的个体分析,从而揭示了AF发作情况在个体内和个体间存在显著差异。