Ashidate Naoto
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2006;108(3):260-5.
Several important issues on research in epileptic psychosis are discussed. The definition of epileptic psychosis has not been well clarified from phenomenological and psychopathological points of view, particularly in association with its psychiatric negative symptoms. It is still uncertain whether epileptic psychosis is distinct from psychoses due to other neurological diseases. A recent trend in its sub classification is to categorize epileptic psychosis based on its chronological relation to preceding seizures (postictal vs. interictal psychoses) rather than its duration (acute/episodic vs. chronic psychoses). While the course and prognosis are crucial to understand the nature of epileptic psychosis and determine its treatment, only a few studies have dealt with these matters. In order to analyse a variety of epilepsy-related, psychosis related and psychosocial factors in a large sample, national and international collaboration will be needed. Standardization of our diagnostic and evaluation skills should be essential for such multi-institutional studies. Furthermore, effects of different public health care systems and socio-economical circumstances are associated with the results of studies on epileptic psychosis.
本文讨论了癫痫性精神病研究中的几个重要问题。从现象学和精神病理学角度来看,癫痫性精神病的定义尚未得到很好的阐明,尤其是与其精神科阴性症状相关的定义。癫痫性精神病是否与其他神经系统疾病所致的精神病不同仍不确定。其亚分类的一个最新趋势是根据与先前发作的时间关系(发作后与发作间期精神病)而非持续时间(急性/发作性与慢性精神病)对癫痫性精神病进行分类。虽然病程和预后对于理解癫痫性精神病的本质和确定其治疗至关重要,但只有少数研究涉及这些问题。为了在大样本中分析各种与癫痫相关、与精神病相关以及社会心理因素,需要国内和国际合作。对于此类多机构研究,我们诊断和评估技能的标准化应该是必不可少的。此外,不同公共卫生保健系统和社会经济环境的影响与癫痫性精神病研究结果相关。