Kim Ana H, Edwards Bruce M, Telian Steven A, Kileny Paul R, Arts H Alexander
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
Otol Neurotol. 2006 Apr;27(3):372-9. doi: 10.1097/00129492-200604000-00014.
To determine whether pre-operative transient otoacoustic emission (TEOAE) patterns are predictive of successful hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery.
Retrospective observational study.
Tertiary referral medical center.
A convenience sample was identified in whom pre-operative TEOAE data were available in patients undergoing acoustic neuroma surgery from 1993-2004. Ninety-three patients were identified who met this inclusion criterion.
Subjects underwent attempted hearing preservation surgery via middle cranial fossa or retrosigmoid approaches. Routine audiometry, ABR, and TEOAE.
Pre- and post-operative pure tone and speech results were categorized into hearing classes A, B, C, and D as described in the American Academy of Otolaryngology guidelines (1995). Hearing preservation was defined by maintenance of the pre-operative hearing class or downgrade to within one hearing class post-op. Pre-operative TEOAE results were divided into five frequency bands and described as positive in each band if there was a response above the noise floor with >50% reproducibility.
Hearing was preserved in 51 patients (55%). Of these, 11 (22%) had positive TEOAE response in all five frequency bands measured (1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 kHz), whereas 40 (78%) had TEOAE responses ranging from 0 to 4 frequency bands. 42 patients failed to preserve their hearing. Of these, only three (7%) had positive TEOAE in all five frequency bands, and 39 (93%) had TEOAE responses ranging from 0 to 4 frequency bands (p<0.05). Other variables of prognostic significance to hearing preservation in our series included smaller tumor size, tumor location within the IAC, better pre-operative hearing, and shorter latencies on ABR. Logistic regression was then used to compare the prognostic value of TEOAE against these variables. In our series, ABR latencies and 5 frequency band response on TEOAE showed the highest significant correlation to hearing preservation (p<0.05).
A robust pre-operative TEOAE frequency band pattern may be used as a favorable prognostic indicator for potential hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery. The prognostic value may be enhanced when combined with other prognostic factors such as tumor size, tumor location, pre-operative ABR and audiometric results.
确定术前瞬态耳声发射(TEOAE)模式是否可预测听神经瘤手术中听力保留的成功与否。
回顾性观察研究。
三级转诊医疗中心。
从1993年至2004年接受听神经瘤手术且有术前TEOAE数据的患者组成了一个便利样本。确定了93名符合该纳入标准的患者。
受试者通过中颅窝或乙状窦后入路接受听力保留手术尝试。进行常规听力测定、听性脑干反应(ABR)和TEOAE检查。
术前和术后的纯音及言语结果按照美国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会指南(1995年)分为听力等级A、B、C和D。听力保留的定义为维持术前听力等级或术后听力等级下降不超过一个等级。术前TEOAE结果分为五个频段,如果每个频段的反应高于本底噪声且重复性>50%,则该频段判定为阳性。
51例患者(55%)听力得到保留。其中,11例(22%)在所有测量的五个频段(1、1.5、2、3、4kHz)均有阳性TEOAE反应,而40例(78%)的TEOAE反应频段为0至4个。42例患者听力未能保留。其中,只有3例(7%)在所有五个频段均有阳性TEOAE反应,39例(93%)的TEOAE反应频段为0至4个(p<0.05)。在我们的研究系列中,对听力保留具有预后意义的其他变量包括肿瘤体积较小、肿瘤位于内听道内、术前听力较好以及ABR潜伏期较短。然后使用逻辑回归比较TEOAE与这些变量的预后价值。在我们的研究系列中,ABR潜伏期和TEOAE的5频段反应与听力保留的相关性最高(p<0.05)。
强大的术前TEOAE频段模式可作为听神经瘤手术中潜在听力保留的良好预后指标。当与其他预后因素如肿瘤大小、肿瘤位置、术前ABR和听力测定结果相结合时,其预后价值可能会增强。