Vizek Vidović Vlasta, Rovan Daria
Lijec Vjesn. 2006 Jan-Feb;128(1-2):56-60.
The nature of expert knowledge is explored from two points of view. One of them questions the possibility of expert judgement making in practice and analyses the possible origins of bias of professional decision making. The second approach assumes that expertise manifests in different approaches in solving problems between beginners and experts who have proven high competence in the field. Shanteau's analysis of particular fields of expertise which shows differences in validity and reliability of professional decision making was also described. These differences to large extent can be attributed to different characteristics of problems specific to a particular field. In The last section of the paper gives an overview of the research results considering the origins of bias in medical expertise.
从两个角度探讨了专家知识的本质。其中一个角度对实践中专家判断的可能性提出质疑，并分析专业决策偏差的可能来源。第二种方法假设，专业知识体现在初学者和在该领域已证明具有高能力的专家在解决问题时的不同方法中。还描述了尚托对特定专业领域的分析，该分析显示了专业决策在有效性和可靠性方面的差异。这些差异在很大程度上可归因于特定领域特有的问题的不同特征。在论文的最后一部分概述了考虑医学专业知识偏差来源的研究结果。
