Suppr超能文献

沙门氏菌交叉污染中的砧板。

Cutting boards in Salmonella cross-contamination.

作者信息

Cliver Dean O

机构信息

University of California, School of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Population Health and Reproduction, Davis, CA 95616-8743, USA.

出版信息

J AOAC Int. 2006 Mar-Apr;89(2):538-42.

Abstract

Cutting boards are commonly perceived as important fomites in cross-contamination of foods with agents such as Salmonella spp., despite the lack of supporting epidemiological data. A variety of woods and plastics have been used to make work surfaces for cutting. In general, wood is said to dull knives less than plastic, and plastic is seen as less porous than wood. Research to model the hypothetical cross-contamination has been done in a variety of ways and has yielded a variety of results. At least some of the work with knife-scarred plastic indicates that the surface is very difficult to clean and disinfect, although this may vary among the polymers used. High-density polyethylene, which is most used in commercial applications, has been shown to delaminate in response to knife scarring. Wood is intrinsically porous, which allows food juices and bacteria to enter the body of the wood unless a highly hydrophobic residue covers the surface. The moisture is drawn in by capillary action until there is no more free fluid on the surface, at which point immigration ceases. Bacteria in the wood pores are not killed instantly, but neither do they return to the surface. Destructive sampling reveals infectious bacteria for hours, but resurrection of these bacteria via knife edges has not been demonstrated. Small plastic cutting boards can be cleaned in a dishwasher (as can some specially treated wooden boards), but the dishwasher may distribute the bacteria onto other food-contact surfaces. Most small wooden boards (i.e., those with no metal joiners in them) can be sterilized in a microwave oven, but this should be unnecessary if accumulation of food residues is prevented. However, 2 epidemiological studies seem to show that cutting board cleaning habits have little influence on the incidence of sporadic salmonellosis. Further, one of these studies indicated that use of plastic cutting boards in home kitchens is hazardous, whereas use of wooden cutting boards is not.

摘要

尽管缺乏流行病学数据支持,但砧板通常被认为是食品受沙门氏菌等病原体交叉污染的重要污染物。人们使用了各种木材和塑料来制作切割用的工作台面。一般来说,据说木材比塑料更不容易使刀具变钝,而塑料被认为比木材孔隙更少。针对假设的交叉污染进行建模的研究采用了多种方法,得出了各种各样的结果。至少一些对有刀痕的塑料进行的研究表明,这种表面很难清洁和消毒,不过这可能因所使用的聚合物而异。商业应用中最常用的高密度聚乙烯已被证明会因刀痕而分层。木材本质上是多孔的,这使得食物汁液和细菌能够进入木材内部,除非表面覆盖有高度疏水的残留物。水分通过毛细作用被吸入,直到表面不再有自由液体,此时细菌的侵入才会停止。木材孔隙中的细菌不会立即被杀死,但它们也不会回到表面。破坏性采样显示,数小时内都能检测到有传染性的细菌,但尚未证明这些细菌会通过刀刃再次出现。小型塑料砧板可以在洗碗机中清洗(一些经过特殊处理的木板也可以),但洗碗机可能会将细菌传播到其他与食品接触的表面。大多数小型木板(即那些没有金属连接件的木板)可以在微波炉中消毒,但如果能防止食物残渣积累,这应该是不必要的。然而,两项流行病学研究似乎表明,砧板的清洁习惯对散发性沙门氏菌病的发病率影响不大。此外,其中一项研究表明,家庭厨房中使用塑料砧板是有害的,而使用木砧板则不然。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验