Huo Teh-Ia, Lin Han-Chieh, Wu Jaw-Ching, Hou Ming-Chih, Lee Fa-Yauh, Lee Pui-Ching, Chang Full-Young, Lee Shou-Dong
National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Clin Transplant. 2006 Mar-Apr;20(2):188-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.00463.x.
The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) has been used to prioritize cirrhotic patients awaiting liver transplantation. Bleeding esophageal varices, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis and hepatic encephalopathy are major complications of cirrhosis and traditional indications for liver transplantation evaluation. However, these complications are not included in the MELD and it is not clear if these complications correlate with MELD score in terms of outcome prediction. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of cirrhosis-related complication as a prognostic predictor in 290 cirrhotic patients. The MELD score and outcome were compared between patients with and without cirrhosis-related complications. There was no significant difference of the MELD score between patients with (n = 67) and without (n = 223) complications (11.6 +/- 2.9 vs. 12.2 +/- 3.2, p = 0.184). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.687 for MELD vs. 0.604 for complications (p = 0.174) at six months, and the area was 0.641 for MELD vs. 0.611 for complications (p = 0.522) at 12 months. A high MELD score and presence of complications had a similar profile of predictive accuracy and both were significant predictors of mortality at six and 12 months in multivariate logistic regression analysis. Patients with cirrhosis-related complications at presentation had a decreased survival compared with those without complications (p < 0.0001). In conclusion, the occurrence of cirrhosis-related complications is a predictor of poor prognosis. While early transplantation referral is recommended, these patients do not necessarily have a higher MELD score and could be down-staged in the MELD era.
终末期肝病模型(MELD)已被用于对等待肝移植的肝硬化患者进行优先级排序。食管静脉曲张破裂出血、自发性细菌性腹膜炎和肝性脑病是肝硬化的主要并发症,也是肝移植评估的传统指征。然而,这些并发症并不包含在MELD中,并且尚不清楚这些并发症在预后预测方面是否与MELD评分相关。本研究旨在探讨肝硬化相关并发症作为290例肝硬化患者预后预测指标的可行性。比较了有和没有肝硬化相关并发症患者的MELD评分和预后。有并发症(n = 67)和无并发症(n = 223)的患者之间MELD评分无显著差异(11.6±2.9对12.2±3.2,p = 0.184)。在6个月时,MELD的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.687,并发症为0.604(p = 0.174);在12个月时,MELD的面积为0.641,并发症为0.611(p = 0.522)。在多因素逻辑回归分析中,高MELD评分和并发症的存在具有相似的预测准确性概况。在6个月和12个月时,两者都是死亡率的重要预测指标。出现肝硬化相关并发症的患者与无并发症患者相比生存率降低(p < 0.0001)。总之,肝硬化相关并发症的发生是预后不良的预测指标。虽然建议早期转诊进行移植,但这些患者的MELD评分不一定更高,在MELD时代可能会被降期。