• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在以非裔美国人为主的肾移植队列中,使用HLAMatchmaker进行人类白细胞抗原表位匹配对移植结果的预测价值。

Predictive value of human leucocyte antigen epitope matching using HLAMatchmaker for graft outcomes in a predominantly African-American renal transplant cohort.

作者信息

Haririan Abdolreza, Fagoaga Omar, Daneshvar Hamidreza, Morawski Katherina, Sillix Dale H, El-Amm Jose M, West Miguel S, Garnick James, Migdal Stephen D, Gruber Scott A, Nehlsen-Cannarella Sandra

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transplant. 2006 Mar-Apr;20(2):226-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.00473.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.00473.x
PMID:16640531
Abstract

The HLAMatchmaker program is based on the donor/recipient comparison of the polymorphic triplet amino-acid sequences of the antibody-accessible regions on the human leucocyte antigen (HLA) molecule. The previous reports on its predictive value for renal allograft outcomes are conflicting. We conducted a retrospective study in a predominantly African-American (AA) cohort (N = 101, 94% AA). HLA typing was performed by molecular methods and triplet matching using HLAMatchmaker. Study end points included graft survival and incidence of acute rejection. The relationship between the number of triplet mismatches (TMM) and the degree of HLA antigen MM was evaluated using Pearson's correlation coefficient. Logistic regression models were used to examine the association between triplet matching and the study end points. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models were used for graft survival analysis. The strongest relationship between the number of TMM and HLA antigen MM was observed for HLA-DQ (r = 0.88). The association between triplet matching at HLA-A, -B, -DR and -DRw HLA loci and the study end points was not statistically significant. However, after grouping, the unadjusted estimates of graft survival for those with more than 10 Class I TMM were significantly worse than the others (p = 0.03). Adjusting for the effect of donor source, recipient characteristics and the immunosuppressive regimen did not change this association (hazard ratio = 0.2, confidence interval = 0.04-1.1). We conclude that triplet matching using HLAMatchmaker can provide useful prognostic information in kidney transplantation and that more than 10 donor/recipient Class I HLA TMM is predictive of worse graft outcome.

摘要

HLAMatchmaker程序基于供体/受体对人类白细胞抗原(HLA)分子上抗体可及区域的多态性三联体氨基酸序列进行比较。先前关于其对肾移植结果预测价值的报告相互矛盾。我们在一个主要为非裔美国人(AA)的队列(N = 101,94%为AA)中进行了一项回顾性研究。采用分子方法进行HLA分型,并使用HLAMatchmaker进行三联体匹配。研究终点包括移植物存活和急性排斥反应的发生率。使用Pearson相关系数评估三联体错配数(TMM)与HLA抗原错配程度之间的关系。使用逻辑回归模型检验三联体匹配与研究终点之间的关联。采用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox比例风险模型进行移植物存活分析。观察到HLA-DQ的TMM数与HLA抗原错配之间的相关性最强(r = 0.88)。HLA-A、-B、-DR和-DRw HLA位点的三联体匹配与研究终点之间的关联无统计学意义。然而,分组后,I类TMM超过10个的患者移植物存活的未调整估计值明显低于其他患者(p = 0.03)。调整供体来源、受体特征和免疫抑制方案的影响后,这种关联没有改变(风险比 = 0.2,置信区间 = 0.04 - 1.1)。我们得出结论,使用HLAMatchmaker进行三联体匹配可为肾移植提供有用的预后信息,并且供体/受体I类HLA TMM超过10个可预测移植物预后较差。

相似文献

1
Predictive value of human leucocyte antigen epitope matching using HLAMatchmaker for graft outcomes in a predominantly African-American renal transplant cohort.在以非裔美国人为主的肾移植队列中,使用HLAMatchmaker进行人类白细胞抗原表位匹配对移植结果的预测价值。
Clin Transplant. 2006 Mar-Apr;20(2):226-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2005.00473.x.
2
Effect of human leukocyte antigen-C and -DQ matching on pediatric heart transplant graft survival.人类白细胞抗原-C和-DQ匹配对小儿心脏移植移植物存活的影响。
J Heart Lung Transplant. 2014 Dec;33(12):1282-7. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2014.07.014. Epub 2014 Jul 22.
3
Critical evaluation of the amino acid triplet-epitope matching concept in cadaver kidney transplantation.
Transplantation. 2004 Mar 27;77(6):902-7. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000114595.59168.3b.
4
HLAmatchmaker: a molecularly based algorithm for histocompatibility determination. III. Effect of matching at the HLA-A,B amino acid triplet level on kidney transplant survival.HLAmatchmaker:一种基于分子的组织相容性判定算法。III. HLA-A、B氨基酸三联体水平匹配对肾移植存活的影响。
Transplantation. 2003 Mar 27;75(6):884-9. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000055101.20821.AC.
5
HLAMatchmaker-based strategy to identify acceptable HLA class I mismatches for highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates.基于HLAMatchmaker的策略,为高度致敏的肾移植候选者识别可接受的HLA I类错配。
Transpl Int. 2004 Jan;17(1):22-30. doi: 10.1007/s00147-003-0641-z. Epub 2003 Aug 30.
6
HLA-DQ matching in cadaveric renal transplantation.尸体肾移植中的HLA-DQ配型
Clin Transplant. 1997 Oct;11(5 Pt 2):480-4.
7
HLAmatchmaker: a molecularly based algorithm for histocompatibility determination. IV. An alternative strategy to increase the number of compatible donors for highly sensitized patients.HLAmatchmaker:一种基于分子的组织相容性判定算法。IV. 为高度致敏患者增加相容供体数量的替代策略。
Transplantation. 2003 Mar 27;75(6):889-97. doi: 10.1097/01.TP.0000055097.58209.83.
8
Eplet Mismatch Load and Occurrence of Donor-Specific Anti-HLA Antibodies, Rejection, and Graft Failure after Kidney Transplantation: An Observational Cohort Study.Eplet 错配负荷与供体特异性抗 HLA 抗体、排斥反应和肾移植后移植物失败的发生:一项观察性队列研究。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Sep;31(9):2193-2204. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2020010019. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
9
An evaluation of HLA cross-reactive group matching on graft survival in deceased donor kidney recipients.对已故供体肾移植受者中HLA交叉反应组匹配对移植物存活情况的评估。
Transplant Proc. 2005 Mar;37(2):661-3. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.12.110.
10
Interaction of mycophenolate mofetil and HLA matching on renal allograft survival.
Transplantation. 2001 Feb 15;71(3):398-401. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200102150-00010.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-organ hierarchy of HLA molecular mismatches in donor-specific antibody development in solid organ transplantations.实体器官移植中供者特异性抗体产生过程中HLA分子错配的跨器官层级关系
Cell Rep Med. 2025 Jun 17;6(6):102153. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.102153. Epub 2025 May 30.
2
Improving long-term kidney allograft survival by rethinking HLA compatibility: from molecular matching to non-HLA genes.通过重新思考HLA相容性提高肾移植长期存活率:从分子匹配到非HLA基因
Front Genet. 2024 Oct 2;15:1442018. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2024.1442018. eCollection 2024.
3
The Humoral Theory of Transplantation: Epitope Analysis and the Pathogenicity of HLA Antibodies.
移植体液理论:抗原表位分析与 HLA 抗体的致病性。
J Immunol Res. 2016;2016:5197396. doi: 10.1155/2016/5197396. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
4
The Association Between Broad Antigen HLA Mismatches, Eplet HLA Mismatches and Acute Rejection After Kidney Transplantation.广泛抗原 HLA 错配、表位 HLA 错配与肾移植后急性排斥反应之间的关联
Transplant Direct. 2016 Nov 23;2(12):e120. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000000632. eCollection 2016 Dec.
5
Predicting alloreactivity in transplantation.预测移植中的同种异体反应性。
J Immunol Res. 2014;2014:159479. doi: 10.1155/2014/159479. Epub 2014 Apr 28.
6
Identification and therapeutic management of highly sensitized patients undergoing renal transplantation.识别和治疗接受肾移植的高度致敏患者。
Drugs. 2012 Jul 9;72(10):1335-54. doi: 10.2165/11631110-000000000-00000.
7
Why can sensitization by an HLA-DR2 mismatch lead to antibodies that react also with HLA-DR1?为什么HLA - DR2错配引起的致敏会导致抗体也与HLA - DR1发生反应?
Hum Immunol. 2009 Jun;70(6):403-9. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2009.03.005. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
8
HLAMatchmaker: a molecularly based algorithm for histocompatibility determination. V. Eplet matching for HLA-DR, HLA-DQ, and HLA-DP.HLAMatchmaker:一种基于分子的组织相容性测定算法。五、HLA-DR、HLA-DQ和HLA-DP的表位匹配
Hum Immunol. 2007 Jan;68(1):12-25. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2006.10.003. Epub 2006 Oct 30.
9
Permanent, lowered HLA class I expression using lentivirus vectors with shRNA constructs: Averting cytotoxicity by alloreactive T lymphocytes.使用带有短发夹RNA(shRNA)构建体的慢病毒载体实现永久性降低HLA I类分子表达:避免同种异体反应性T淋巴细胞的细胞毒性作用
Transplant Proc. 2006 Dec;38(10):3184-8. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2006.10.158.
10
A structurally based approach to determine HLA compatibility at the humoral immune level.一种基于结构的方法,用于在体液免疫水平确定HLA相容性。
Hum Immunol. 2006 Nov;67(11):847-62. doi: 10.1016/j.humimm.2006.08.001. Epub 2006 Sep 1.