Suppr超能文献

[宫颈癌患者放疗前的新辅助化疗]

[Neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radiotherapy in treatment of patients with cervical carcinoma].

作者信息

Li Qing-shui, Zhang Xi-qin, Li Da-peng, Sheng Xiu-gui, Du Xue-lian, Song Qu-qing

机构信息

Department of Gynecological Oncology, Shandong Provincial Tumor Hospital, Jinan 250117, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2006 Feb;41(2):83-7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To study the value of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in treatment of cervical carcinoma.

METHODS

A clinical prospective study was carried out from Jan 1991 to Dec 2003. Totally 1609 patients with cervical carcinoma were given two cycles of combined chemotherapy before radiotherapy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy group, group A). Another 375 patients who accepted radiotherapy alone in our hospital from Jan 1989 to Dec 1990 were chosen as the control group (group B). Short-term control rate, long-term survival rate and complications were observed and analyzed.

RESULTS

In group A, after two cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the overall response rate was 74.5% (1199/1609), the complete response rate was 1.6% (25/1609). The survival rate of 3, 5 and 10-year was 90.3% (1017/1126), 75.3% (652/866), and 59.0% (200/339), respectively. Five-year survival rate in stage II was higher than that in stage III (P < 0.05), but 3-year and 10-year survival rate were not different between stages II and III (P > 0.05). In group B, 3, 5 and 10-year survival rate was 81.1% (304/375), 59.2% (222/375), and 40.3% (151/375), respectively. The 5-year and 10-year survival rate was significantly higher in stage II than that in stage III (P < 0.05). The 5 and 10-year survival rate was significantly higher in group A than that in group B (P < 0.05). The 3, 5 and 10-year survival rate of patients with adenocarcinoma in group A was obviously higher than that in group B (P < 0.05), and the 3 and 5-year recurrent and metastatic rate was significantly lower in group A than that in group B (P < 0.05). In group A, the short-term toxicity and side-effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy were mainly slight and moderate, and the short-term and long-term radiation complications had no obvious difference between two groups (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a safe and effective method for the treatment of cervical carcinoma. Because of satisfactory short-term control rate and high long-term survival rate, neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be popularized in clinical treatment, especially in those patients with adenocarcinoma and in patients at clinically advanced stage of cervical carcinoma.

摘要

目的

探讨新辅助化疗在宫颈癌治疗中的价值。

方法

1991年1月至2003年12月进行一项临床前瞻性研究。共1609例宫颈癌患者在放疗前给予两个周期的联合化疗(新辅助化疗组,A组)。另选取1989年1月至1990年12月在我院单纯接受放疗的375例患者作为对照组(B组)。观察并分析短期控制率、长期生存率及并发症。

结果

A组新辅助化疗两个周期后,总有效率为74.5%(1199/1609),完全缓解率为1.6%(25/1609)。3年、5年和10年生存率分别为90.3%(1017/1126)、75.3%(652/866)和59.0%(200/339)。Ⅱ期患者5年生存率高于Ⅲ期(P<0.05),但Ⅱ期和Ⅲ期患者3年和10年生存率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。B组3年、5年和10年生存率分别为81.1%(304/375)、59.2%(222/375)和40.3%(151/375)。Ⅱ期患者5年和十年生存率显著高于Ⅲ期(P<0.05)。A组5年和10年生存率显著高于B组(P<0.05)。A组腺癌患者3年、5年和10年生存率明显高于B组(P<0.05),A组3年和5年复发转移率显著低于B组(P<0.05)。A组新辅助化疗的短期毒性和副作用主要为轻度和中度,两组短期和长期放疗并发症差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

新辅助化疗是治疗宫颈癌的一种安全有效的方法。由于短期控制率满意,长期生存率高,新辅助化疗应在临床治疗中推广,尤其是腺癌患者及临床晚期宫颈癌患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验