Moll van Charante Eric, Giesen Paul, Mokkink Henk, Oort Frans, Grol Richard, Klazinga Niek, Bindels Patrick
Department of General Practice, Academic Medical Centre-University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 15, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Fam Pract. 2006 Aug;23(4):437-43. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cml017. Epub 2006 Apr 26.
Since the turn of the millennium, out-of-hours primary health care in The Netherlands has faced a substantial change from small locum groups towards large GP cooperatives. Improving the quality of care requires evaluation of patient satisfaction.
To develop a reliable postal questionnaire for wide-scale use by patients contacting their out-of-hours GP cooperative and to present the results of a national survey.
Literature review and interviews with both patients and health carers were carried out to identify issues of potential relevance, followed by two postal pilot studies and additional interviews to remove or rephrase items. Finally, postal questionnaires were sent to 14,400 people who contacted one of 24 GP cooperatives in The Netherlands.
Overall response was 52.2% for all types of contact. Three scales were identified prior to the field phase and confirmed by principal components analysis: telephone nurse, doctor and organization. Reliability was high, with Cronbach's alphas and intraclass correlation coefficients exceeding 0.70 for all scales. Only items in the organization scale showed clear differences among the participating cooperatives. Respondents receiving telephone advice showed lower levels of satisfaction than respondents with other types of contact (P < 0.001); centre consultation scored lower than home visit (P < 0.030 or less for all differences).
A reliable measure of patient satisfaction has been developed that can also be used for the comparison of GP cooperatives on an organizational level. Overall satisfaction was high, showing highest levels for home visit and lowest levels for telephone advice.
自千禧年之交以来,荷兰的非工作时间初级医疗保健经历了从小型临时替班团队向大型全科医生合作社的重大转变。提高医疗质量需要对患者满意度进行评估。
开发一种可靠的邮政调查问卷,供联系非工作时间全科医生合作社的患者广泛使用,并呈现全国性调查结果。
进行文献综述以及与患者和医护人员的访谈,以确定潜在相关问题,随后进行两项邮政试点研究并开展额外访谈,以删除或重新表述项目。最后,向联系荷兰24家全科医生合作社之一的14400人发送邮政调查问卷。
所有类型联系的总体回复率为52.2%。在实地调查阶段之前确定了三个量表,并通过主成分分析得到确认:电话护士、医生和组织。信度较高,所有量表的克朗巴哈系数和组内相关系数均超过0.70。只有组织量表中的项目在参与的合作社之间存在明显差异。接受电话咨询的受访者满意度低于其他类型联系的受访者(P < 0.001);中心会诊得分低于家访(所有差异的P < 0.030或更低)。
已开发出一种可靠的患者满意度测量方法,也可用于在组织层面比较全科医生合作社。总体满意度较高,家访的满意度最高,电话咨询的满意度最低。