Salisbury C, Burgess A, Lattimer V, Heaney D, Walker J, Turnbull J, Smith H
Academic Unit of Primary Health Care, University of Bristol, UK.
Fam Pract. 2005 Oct;22(5):560-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmi050. Epub 2005 Jun 17.
Governmental reviews of out-of-hours services in England and Scotland have recommended that a standard questionnaire should be used to assess patient satisfaction. This is important because of the rapid introduction of new forms of care.
To produce a brief, reliable and valid measure of patient satisfaction for use by a wide variety of providers of out-of-hours primary care.
The Short Questionnaire for Out-of-Hours care was designed and compared with a longer questionnaire which had been validated and used in earlier research. Questionnaires were sent to 1906 people contacting an out-of-hours GP co-operative. Three versions of the short questionnaire were used with different formats. Analysis compared the response rates, measurement properties, concurrent and construct validity of the short and long questionnaires, and of different versions of the short questionnaire.
There was no significant difference in the overall response rates obtained from the short or long questionnaires (45.7% versus 41.9%; P = 0.17). The effective response rate of questionnaires from which all satisfaction scales could be calculated was higher for the short questionnaire (43.0% versus 36.4%; P = 0.01). There were no significant differences in response rates or distribution of responses between different versions of the short questionnaire. There was moderate agreement between items on the short questionnaire and corresponding scales on the long questionnaire. Scores using the short questionnaire showed anticipated relationships with the age and sex of patients and with characteristics of how the service was delivered. The SQOC is valid and reliable for routine service use.
英格兰和苏格兰政府对非工作时间服务进行的审查建议,应使用标准问卷来评估患者满意度。鉴于新护理形式的迅速引入,这一点很重要。
编制一份简短、可靠且有效的患者满意度测量工具,供各类非工作时间初级护理提供者使用。
设计了非工作时间护理简短问卷,并与一份更长的问卷进行比较,该长问卷已在早期研究中得到验证并使用。向1906名联系非工作时间全科医生合作组织的人发送了问卷。使用了三种不同格式的简短问卷版本。分析比较了简短问卷和长问卷以及简短问卷不同版本的回复率、测量属性、同时效度和结构效度。
简短问卷和长问卷的总体回复率没有显著差异(45.7%对41.9%;P = 0.17)。对于简短问卷,能够计算所有满意度量表的问卷有效回复率更高(43.0%对36.4%;P = 0.01)。简短问卷不同版本之间的回复率或回复分布没有显著差异。简短问卷上的项目与长问卷上的相应量表之间存在中等程度的一致性。使用简短问卷得出的分数显示出与患者年龄、性别以及服务提供方式的特征之间存在预期的关系。非工作时间护理简短问卷对于常规服务使用是有效且可靠的。