[深刺与浅刺治疗突发性聋的疗效比较]
[Comparison of therapeutic effects of deep needling and shallow needling on sudden deafness].
作者信息
Zhang Cui-yan, Wang Yin
机构信息
Guang'anmen Hospital, China Academy of TCM, Beijing 100053, China.
出版信息
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2006 Apr;26(4):256-8.
OBJECTIVE
To explore and evaluate therapeutic effect of different needling methods on sudden deafness.
METHODS
Forty-seven cases were randomly divided into a treatment group of 23 cases who were treated by deep needling at Ermen (TE 21), Tinggong (SI 19) and Tinghui (GB 2) combined with body acupuncture, and a control group of 24 cases who were treated with shallow needling at these acupoints combined with body acupuncture. Changes of hearing at different stages after treatment were observed and compared between the two groups.
RESULTS
The effective rate was 87.0% in the treatment group and 29.2% in the control group, with a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
The therapeutic effect of the deep needling group is better than that of the shallow needling group.
目的
探讨并评价不同针刺方法对突发性聋的治疗效果。
方法
将47例患者随机分为治疗组23例，采用耳门（TE 21）、听宫（SI 19）、听会（GB 2）深刺结合体针治疗；对照组24例，采用上述穴位浅刺结合体针治疗。观察并比较两组治疗后不同阶段的听力变化。
结果
治疗组有效率为87.0%，对照组为29.2%，两组差异有统计学意义（P < 0.05）。
结论
深刺组的治疗效果优于浅刺组。
Zotero 插件