[普通针刺与短针浅刺治疗肩周炎的疗效比较]
[Comparison of therapeutic effects between normal acupuncture and shallow needling with short-needle on periarthritis of shoulder].
作者信息
Chen Li
机构信息
TCM Group, Lishui Health School, Zhejiang 323000, China.
出版信息
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2006 Sep;26(9):647-8.
OBJECTIVE
To compare therapeutic effects between normal acupuncture and shallow needling with short-needle, and search for therapeutic tool and method easy to be accepted by the patient of periarthritis of shoulder.
METHODS
One hundred and fifty-two cases of periarthritis of shoulder were randomly divided into 2 groups. They were treated by normal acupuncture and shallow needling with short-needle, respectively. The two groups were same in acupoints selected and the therapeutic course, and their therapeutic effects and the accepting degrees of the patient were investigated.
RESULTS
The cured rate was 67.1% in the normal acupuncture group and 69.7% in the shallow needling with short-needle group, with no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).
CONCLUSION
Normal acupuncture and shallow needling with short-needle have similar therapeutic effect on periarthritis of shoulder, but the shallow needling with short-needle can obviously relieve the pain and mental fear in treatment, easy to be accepted.
目的
比较常规针刺与短针浅刺治疗肩周炎的疗效，探寻易为肩周炎患者接受的治疗手段与方法。
方法
将152例肩周炎患者随机分为2组，分别采用常规针刺与短针浅刺治疗。两组所选穴位及疗程相同，观察两组疗效及患者接受程度。
结果
常规针刺组治愈率为67.1%，短针浅刺组治愈率为69.7%，两组比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。
结论
常规针刺与短针浅刺治疗肩周炎疗效相似，但短针浅刺能明显减轻治疗时的疼痛及心理恐惧，易于被接受。
Zotero 插件