Chen Li
TCM Group, Lishui Health School, Zhejiang 323000, China.
Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2006 Sep;26(9):647-8.
To compare therapeutic effects between normal acupuncture and shallow needling with short-needle, and search for therapeutic tool and method easy to be accepted by the patient of periarthritis of shoulder.
One hundred and fifty-two cases of periarthritis of shoulder were randomly divided into 2 groups. They were treated by normal acupuncture and shallow needling with short-needle, respectively. The two groups were same in acupoints selected and the therapeutic course, and their therapeutic effects and the accepting degrees of the patient were investigated.
The cured rate was 67.1% in the normal acupuncture group and 69.7% in the shallow needling with short-needle group, with no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).
Normal acupuncture and shallow needling with short-needle have similar therapeutic effect on periarthritis of shoulder, but the shallow needling with short-needle can obviously relieve the pain and mental fear in treatment, easy to be accepted.
比较常规针刺与短针浅刺治疗肩周炎的疗效，探寻易为肩周炎患者接受的治疗手段与方法。
将152例肩周炎患者随机分为2组，分别采用常规针刺与短针浅刺治疗。两组所选穴位及疗程相同，观察两组疗效及患者接受程度。
常规针刺组治愈率为67.1%，短针浅刺组治愈率为69.7%，两组比较差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。
常规针刺与短针浅刺治疗肩周炎疗效相似，但短针浅刺能明显减轻治疗时的疼痛及心理恐惧，易于被接受。
