Palmieri Vittorio, Innocenti Francesca, Agresti Chiara, Caldi Francesca, Masotti Giulio, Pini Riccardo
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Federico II University School of Medicine, Naples, Italy.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2006 May;19(5):483-90. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2005.11.017.
Cross-sectional studies reported that left ventricular (LV) systolic and diastolic functions are correlated. However, whether changes in wall-motion score index (WMSI) or 2-dimensional ejection fraction (EF) predict changes of Doppler parameters of LV diastolic function is unclear.
Patients with known or suspected history of coronary artery disease underwent assessment of LV systolic function (WMSI, EF) and diastolic function at baseline and during stress echocardiography by low-dose dobutamine (LDD) (peak infusion 10 microg/kg/min). Peak velocities of early (E) and late (A) LV filling waves and E wave deceleration time were measured according to standard protocol. E wave propagation rate (EVp) was assessed by color Doppler M-mode across the mitral valve. Tei index was calculated as: (A wave to E wave time - ejection time)/ejection time. Changes at LDD were calculated as: 100 x (value at LDD - value at baseline)/baseline.
The study group comprised 66 patients, mean age 61 +/- 10 years, 80% men. Worse LV systolic function was associated with more severely impaired LV diastolic function both at baseline and at LDD. However, percent change of WMSI and change in EF did not correlate with percent change of EVp and E/E wave propagation rate, but with percent change of Tei index. At LDD, patients with myocardial viability did not show greater percent change of LV diastolic function parameters but significantly lower Tei index.
In patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease, assessment of diastolic function reserve by LDD stress echocardiography using traditional and color M-mode Doppler may add quantitative information on myocardial function beyond traditional assessment of contractility reserve by WMSI or EF.
横断面研究报告称左心室(LV)的收缩和舒张功能相关。然而,室壁运动评分指数(WMSI)或二维射血分数(EF)的变化是否能预测LV舒张功能多普勒参数的变化尚不清楚。
有已知或疑似冠状动脉疾病病史的患者在基线时以及在低剂量多巴酚丁胺(LDD)(峰值输注速率10μg/kg/min)负荷超声心动图检查期间接受LV收缩功能(WMSI、EF)和舒张功能评估。根据标准方案测量LV早期(E)和晚期(A)充盈波的峰值速度以及E波减速时间。通过二尖瓣的彩色多普勒M型测量E波传播速度(EVp)。Tei指数计算为:(A波至E波时间 - 射血时间)/射血时间。LDD时的变化计算为:100×(LDD时的值 - 基线时的值)/基线值。
研究组包括66例患者,平均年龄61±10岁,80%为男性。在基线和LDD时,较差的LV收缩功能均与更严重受损的LV舒张功能相关。然而,WMSI的变化百分比和EF的变化与EVp和E/E波传播速度的变化百分比无关,但与Tei指数的变化百分比相关。在LDD时,具有心肌存活性的患者LV舒张功能参数的变化百分比并未更高,但Tei指数显著更低。
在疑似或已知冠状动脉疾病的患者中,使用传统和彩色M型多普勒的LDD负荷超声心动图评估舒张功能储备,可能会在通过WMSI或EF进行传统收缩功能储备评估之外,增加有关心肌功能的定量信息。