Hasegawa T, Nadai M, Apichartpichean R, Muraoka I, Nabeshima T, Takagi K
Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Japan.
J Pharm Sci. 1991 Oct;80(10):962-5. doi: 10.1002/jps.2600801012.
Disposition of diprophylline (DPP) and proxyphylline (PXP) and the effect of enoxacin on their disposition were investigated in rats. Concentrations of the two drugs in plasma and urine were measured by HPLC. The pharmacokinetic parameters of the two drugs were estimated by model-independent methods. Although the chemical structures of the two drugs are very similar, remarkable differences in the disposition of the two drugs were observed. Total body clearance (CLT) of DPP was 1.77 L/h/kg, which was sevenfold greater than that of PXP (0.26 L/h/kg). Diprophylline was excreted in an almost completely unchanged form in the urine, but only 50% of PXP was excreted. However, no binding of either drug to proteins in rat plasma was observed. The DPP renal clearance (CLR) was 1.75 L/h/kg, approximately 13-fold the CLR for PXP (0.13 L/h/kg) and sevenfold the rat glomerular filtration rate. This study indicates that in rats, DPP is mainly excreted by active tubular secretion and that renal tubular reabsorption contributes to renal excretion of PXP with glomerular filtration. No significant changes in any pharmacokinetic parameters of the two drugs were observed when they were coadministered with enoxacin, compared with the drug administered alone, suggesting that enoxacin had no effect on the pharmacokinetics of either drug.
在大鼠中研究了二羟丙茶碱(DPP)和丙羟茶碱(PXP)的处置情况以及依诺沙星对它们处置的影响。通过高效液相色谱法测定血浆和尿液中这两种药物的浓度。采用非模型依赖方法估算这两种药物的药代动力学参数。尽管这两种药物的化学结构非常相似,但观察到它们在处置方面存在显著差异。DPP的总体清除率(CLT)为1.77 L/h/kg,是PXP(0.26 L/h/kg)的7倍。二羟丙茶碱以几乎完全未改变的形式经尿液排泄,但丙羟茶碱只有50%经尿液排泄。然而,未观察到这两种药物与大鼠血浆中的蛋白质结合。DPP的肾清除率(CLR)为1.75 L/h/kg,约为PXP的CLR(0.13 L/h/kg)的13倍,是大鼠肾小球滤过率的7倍。该研究表明,在大鼠中,DPP主要通过肾小管主动分泌排泄,而肾小管重吸收对丙羟茶碱经肾小球滤过的肾排泄有贡献。与单独给药相比,这两种药物与依诺沙星合用时,其任何药代动力学参数均未观察到显著变化,提示依诺沙星对这两种药物的药代动力学均无影响。