Séronie-Vivien Sophie, Toullec Stéphanie, Malard Laurence, Thomas Fabienne, Durrand Valérie, Chatelut Etienne
Department of Clinical Biology, Institute Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France.
Med Oncol. 2006;23(1):63-73. doi: 10.1385/MO:23:1:63.
Serum creatinine (SCr) and Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance (CG CrCL) are used to estimate glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Other markers have been proposed including serum cystatin C (cysC) and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study equation.
We have compared the diagnostic performances of SCr, cysC, CG CrCL, and the MDRD equation in 144 cancer patients. For reference we used either the measured or the predicted carboplatin clearance, which is around the GFR + 25 mL/min.
CysC was more sensitive than SCr (70.1% vs 13.4%) but was not very specific (61% for a cut-off = 0.95 mL). CysC values were higher in 40 cancer patients vs 40 healthy controls with a similar and normal mean CG CrCL (1.08 vs 0.71 mg/L; p < 0.001). CG and the MDRD equations gave similar values for Pearson's coefficient, ROC-plot AUC, and precision, except for patients with poor general status, where the MDRD equation was better (MAPE: 12.4% vs 19.6%, p < 0.001; R: 0.908 vs 0.813).
In cancer patients, cysC is a more sensitive indicator of the glomerular filtration rate than SCr, but its diagnostic performance is lower than for CG CrCL. There may be no advantage in replacing the CG equation by the MDRD equation except for patients with severe malnutrition and/or inflammation.
血清肌酐(SCr)和Cockcroft - Gault肌酐清除率(CG CrCL)用于估算肾小球滤过率(GFR)。还提出了其他标志物,包括血清胱抑素C(cysC)和肾脏病饮食改良(MDRD)研究方程。
我们比较了144例癌症患者中SCr、cysC、CG CrCL和MDRD方程的诊断性能。作为参考,我们使用实测的或预测的卡铂清除率,其约为GFR + 25 mL/分钟。
CysC比SCr更敏感(70.1%对13.4%),但特异性不强(临界值=0.95 mL时为61%)。40例癌症患者的CysC值高于40例健康对照者,而两组的平均CG CrCL相似且正常(1.08对0.71 mg/L;p < 0.001)。CG和MDRD方程在Pearson系数、ROC曲线下面积(AUC)和精密度方面给出了相似的值,但一般状况较差的患者除外,此时MDRD方程表现更好(平均绝对百分比误差:12.4%对19.6%,p < 0.001;R:0.908对0.813)。
在癌症患者中,cysC是比SCr更敏感的肾小球滤过率指标,但其诊断性能低于CG CrCL。除了严重营养不良和/或炎症患者外,用MDRD方程替代CG方程可能没有优势。