Santoro Giuseppe, Bigazzi Maurizio Cappelli, Lacono Carola, Gaio Gianpiero, Caputo Salvatore, Pisacane Carlo, Caianiello Giuseppe, Russo Maria Giovanna, Calabrò Raffaele
Division of Cardiology, Monaldi Hospital, Second University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2006 Mar;7(3):176-81. doi: 10.2459/01.JCM.0000203852.82643.f2.
Transcatheter closure of atrial septal defects (ASDs) is currently a reliable alternative to surgery, even though challenging in the case of complex septal anatomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and mid-term results of percutaneous closure of complex ASDs in a tertiary referral centre compared with simple ASD closure.
Between April 2000 and November 2004, 209 patients were submitted to transcatheter ASD closure; 83 patients (39.7%) presented with a complex defect (large ASDs with a deficient rim or a multifenestrated/aneurysmal septum) and were treated using different devices tailored to the atrial septal anatomy.
The transcatheter procedure was successful in 72 patients (86.8%), using a single device in 69 patients and two devices in the remaining three patients. Overall, 71 Amplatzer septal occluders, two multifenestrated Amplatzer septal occluders and two Cardioseal/Starflex devices were used. Procedural and fluoroscopy times were 141 +/- 45 min and 28 +/- 22 min, respectively (P < 0.0001 vs. simple ASD closure for both comparisons). Procedure-related complications were recorded in nine patients (12.5%) (P < 0.01 vs. simple ASD closure). One patient required surgical repair of a femoral arteriovenous fistula and another developed mitral valve dysfunction. Immediate ASD occlusion was recorded in 59.7% of patients, reaching 95.9% at the last follow-up control (P = NS vs. simple ASD closure for both comparisons).
Percutaneous closure of complex ASDs may be considered technically feasible, relatively safe and highly effective, although the procedure is still significantly more demanding than transcatheter closure of simple ASDs.
经导管封堵房间隔缺损(ASD)目前是一种可靠的手术替代方法,尽管在复杂的房间隔解剖结构情况下具有挑战性。本研究的目的是评估在三级转诊中心经皮封堵复杂ASD与简单ASD封堵相比的可行性和中期结果。
2000年4月至2004年11月期间,209例患者接受了经导管ASD封堵;83例患者(39.7%)存在复杂缺损(大ASD伴边缘不足或多筛孔/瘤样间隔),并使用根据房间隔解剖结构定制的不同装置进行治疗。
72例患者(86.8%)经导管手术成功,69例患者使用单个装置,其余3例患者使用两个装置。总体而言,使用了71个Amplatzer房间隔封堵器、2个多筛孔Amplatzer房间隔封堵器和2个Cardioseal/Starflex装置。手术时间和透视时间分别为141±45分钟和28±22分钟(与简单ASD封堵相比,两项比较P均<0.0001)。9例患者(12.5%)记录了与手术相关的并发症(与简单ASD封堵相比P<0.01)。1例患者需要手术修复股动静脉瘘,另1例患者出现二尖瓣功能障碍。59.7%的患者记录了ASD立即封堵,在最后一次随访时达到95.9%(与简单ASD封堵相比,两项比较P均=无显著性差异)。
经皮封堵复杂ASD在技术上可能被认为是可行的、相对安全且高效的,尽管该手术仍比经导管封堵简单ASD要求高得多。