Ideguchi Haruko, Ohno Shigeru, Hattori Hideaki, Senuma Akiko, Ishigatsubo Yoshiaki
Intractable Disease Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8(3):R76. doi: 10.1186/ar1943. Epub 2006 Apr 28.
We conducted the present study to determine whether repair of erosions occurs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and to compare clinical characteristics between patients exhibiting and not exhibiting erosion repair. We included in the study a total of 122 RA patients who fulfilled the 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria for RA; all patients had paired sequential radiographs of both hands and wrists showing erosive changes at baseline. Patients were classified into two groups according to the presence of repair of erosions at follow up, namely the 'repair observed' and 'repair not observed' groups. Clinical characteristics, disease activity, radiographic scores and treatment in the two groups were compared. Forty-four repairs were observed in 13 patients (10.7%). Compared with the repair not observed group, the functional class of the patients in the repair observed group was lower at baseline (P < 0.01) and the mean disease activity was lower at follow up (P < 0.005). The changes in radiographic scores per year (total radiographic score and erosion score) were lower (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively) in the repair observed group. No difference in treatment was observed. Repair of erosions was detected in 10.7% of RA patients treated with conventional DMARDs. Repairs were associated with low functional class at baseline and low disease activity at follow up. These observations support the importance of reduction in disease activity in RA patients. Because repair of erosions was detected in a substantial number of patients, assessment of erosion repair should be incorporated into the radiographic evaluation and scoring of RA.
我们开展本研究以确定接受传统抗风湿药物(DMARDs)治疗的类风湿关节炎(RA)患者是否会出现糜烂修复,并比较出现和未出现糜烂修复的患者的临床特征。我们纳入了122例符合1987年美国风湿病学会RA标准的RA患者;所有患者均有双手和双腕的配对序列X线片,显示基线时有糜烂改变。根据随访时糜烂修复情况,将患者分为两组,即“观察到修复”组和“未观察到修复”组。比较两组的临床特征、疾病活动度、影像学评分和治疗情况。13例患者(10.7%)观察到44处修复。与未观察到修复组相比,观察到修复组患者的功能分级在基线时更低(P < 0.01),随访时平均疾病活动度更低(P < 0.005)。观察到修复组每年影像学评分的变化(总影像学评分和糜烂评分)更低(分别为P < 0.05和P < 0.01)。治疗方面未观察到差异。在接受传统DMARDs治疗的RA患者中,10.7%检测到糜烂修复。修复与基线时低功能分级和随访时低疾病活动度相关。这些观察结果支持降低RA患者疾病活动度具有重要意义。由于在大量患者中检测到糜烂修复,糜烂修复评估应纳入RA的影像学评估和评分中。