Jelovsek J Eric, Barber Matthew D
Division of Urogynecology and Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 May;194(5):1455-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.060.
Women who seek treatment for pelvic organ prolapse strive for an improvement in quality of life. Body image has been shown to be an important component of differences in quality of life. To date, there are no data on body image in patients with advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Our objective was to compare body image and quality of life in women with advanced pelvic organ prolapse with normal controls.
We used a case-control study design. Cases were defined as subjects who presented to a tertiary urogynecology clinic with advanced pelvic organ prolapse (stage 3 or 4). Controls were defined as subjects who presented to a tertiary care gynecology or women's health clinic for an annual visit with normal pelvic floor support (stage 0 or 1) and without urinary incontinence. All patients completed a valid and reliable body image scale and a generalized (Short Form Health Survey) and condition-specific (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20) quality-of-life scale. Linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to adjust for possible confounding variables.
Forty-seven case and 51 control subjects were enrolled. After controlling for age, race, parity, previous hysterectomy, and medical comorbidities, subjects with advanced pelvic organ prolapse were more likely to feel self-conscious (adjusted odds ratio 4.7; 95% confidence interval 1.4 to 18, P = .02), less likely to feel physically attractive (adjusted odds ratio 11; 95% confidence interval 2.9 to 51, P < .001), less likely to feel feminine (adjusted odds ratio 4.0; 95% confidence interval 1.2 to 15, P = .03), and less likely to feel sexually attractive (adjusted odds ratio 4.6; 95% confidence interval 1.4 to 17, P = .02) than normal controls. The groups were similar in their feeling of dissatisfaction with appearance when dressed, difficulty looking at themselves naked, avoiding people because of appearance, and overall dissatisfaction with their body. Subjects with advanced pelvic organ prolapse suffered significantly lower quality of life on the physical scale of the SF-12 (mean 42; 95% confidence interval 39 to 45 versus mean 50; 95% confidence interval 47 to 53, P < .009). However, no differences between groups were noted on the mental scale of the SF-12 (mean 51; 95% confidence interval 50 to 54 versus mean 50; 95% confidence interval 47 to 52, P = .56). Additionally, subjects with advanced pelvic organ prolapse scored significantly worse on the prolapse, urinary, and colorectal scales and overall summary score of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 than normal controls (mean summary score 104; 95% confidence interval 90 to 118 versus mean 29; 95% confidence interval 16 to 43, P < .0001), indicating a decrease in condition-specific quality of life. Worsening body image correlated with lower quality of life on both the physical and mental scales of the SF-12 as well as the prolapse, urinary, and colorectal scales and overall summary score of Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 in subjects with advanced pelvic organ prolapse.
Women seeking treatment for advanced pelvic organ prolapse have decreased body image and overall quality of life. Body image may be a key determinant for quality of life in patients with advanced prolapse and may be an important outcome measure for treatment evaluation in clinical trials.
寻求盆腔器官脱垂治疗的女性渴望生活质量得到改善。身体形象已被证明是生活质量差异的一个重要组成部分。迄今为止,尚无关于晚期盆腔器官脱垂患者身体形象的数据。我们的目的是比较晚期盆腔器官脱垂女性与正常对照组的身体形象和生活质量。
我们采用病例对照研究设计。病例定义为到三级泌尿妇科诊所就诊的晚期盆腔器官脱垂(3期或4期)患者。对照组定义为到三级医疗妇科或女性健康诊所进行年度检查且盆底支持正常(0期或1期)且无尿失禁的患者。所有患者均完成了一份有效且可靠的身体形象量表以及一份通用的(简短健康调查)和特定疾病的(盆底困扰量表-20)生活质量量表。进行线性和逻辑回归分析以调整可能的混杂变量。
纳入了47例病例和51例对照受试者。在控制了年龄、种族、产次、既往子宫切除术和合并症后,晚期盆腔器官脱垂患者更有可能感到自觉难为情(调整后的优势比为4.7;95%置信区间为1.4至18,P = 0.02),感觉自己身体有吸引力的可能性较小(调整后的优势比为11;95%置信区间为2.9至51,P < 0.001),感觉有女性特质的可能性较小(调整后的优势比为4.0;95%置信区间为1.2至15,P = 0.03),以及感觉有性吸引力的可能性较小(调整后的优势比为4.6;95%置信区间为1.4至17,P = 0.02),与正常对照组相比。两组在穿着时对外观的不满意感、裸体看自己的困难程度、因外观而避开他人以及对自己身体的总体不满意感方面相似。晚期盆腔器官脱垂患者在SF-12身体量表上的生活质量显著较低(平均42;95%置信区间为39至45,而平均为50;95%置信区间为47至53,P < 0.009)。然而,两组在SF-12心理量表上未发现差异(平均51;95%置信区间为50至54,而平均为50;95%置信区间为47至52,P = 0.56)。此外,晚期盆腔器官脱垂患者在盆底困扰量表-20的脱垂、泌尿和结直肠量表以及总体总结评分上的得分显著低于正常对照组(平均总结评分为104;95%置信区间为90至118,而平均为29;95%置信区间为16至43,P < 0.0001),表明特定疾病的生活质量下降。在晚期盆腔器官脱垂患者中,身体形象的恶化与SF-12身体和心理量表以及盆底困扰量表-20的脱垂、泌尿和结直肠量表以及总体总结评分的较低生活质量相关。
寻求晚期盆腔器官脱垂治疗的女性身体形象和总体生活质量下降。身体形象可能是晚期脱垂患者生活质量的关键决定因素,并且可能是临床试验中治疗评估的重要结局指标。