Walji Rishma, Boon Heather
Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 19 Russell Street, Toronto, Ont., Canada.
Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2006 May;12(2):91-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ctcp.2005.10.001. Epub 2006 Mar 30.
The randomized controlled trial (RCT) is considered the 'gold standard' methodology for evaluating efficacy of an intervention. It has been argued that RCTs cannot be used to examine the effectiveness of acupuncture.
The purpose of this paper is to examine the applicability of an RCT study design for acupuncture research.
RCTs would be more effective in studying acupuncture if study participants were randomized to groups based on the acupuncture diagnosis and not solely on the Western diagnostic criteria. Treatments must also be standardized somewhat to ensure replicability of the study and the information it provides. Blinding is not absolutely necessary for a good-quality RCT; however, if used, control groups need to be standardized and sham techniques evaluated to ensure accurate interpretation of results.
With these factors combined, it is possible to greatly increase internal and external validity in acupuncture RCTs.
随机对照试验(RCT)被认为是评估干预措施疗效的“金标准”方法。有人认为随机对照试验不能用于检验针灸的有效性。
本文旨在探讨随机对照试验研究设计在针灸研究中的适用性。
如果研究参与者是根据针灸诊断而非仅基于西方诊断标准随机分组,随机对照试验在研究针灸方面会更有效。治疗方法也必须在一定程度上标准化,以确保研究及其提供的信息具有可重复性。对于高质量的随机对照试验,盲法并非绝对必要;然而,如果使用盲法,对照组需要标准化,假针刺技术也需要评估,以确保对结果的准确解读。
综合这些因素,有可能大幅提高针灸随机对照试验的内部和外部效度。