Klein Daniel N, Shankman Stewart A, Rose Suzanne
Department of Psychology, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794-2500, USA.
Am J Psychiatry. 2006 May;163(5):872-80. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2006.163.5.872.
The purpose of this study was to describe the 10-year course and outcome of dysthymic disorder.
The authors conducted a naturalistic, prospective, longitudinal follow-up of 97 adults with early-onset dysthymic disorder and 45 adults with nonchronic major depressive disorder selected from consecutive admissions to several outpatient facilities. Follow-up data were obtained for 90% of the cohort. Assessments were conducted at baseline, 30, 60, 90, and 120 months. Measures included the Longitudinal Interval Follow-Up Evaluation and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale.
The Kaplan-Meier estimated recovery rate from dysthymic disorder was 73.9%, with a median time to recovery of 52 months. Among patients who recovered, the estimated risk of relapse into another period of chronic depression was 71.4%. Chronic depressive relapses took a variety of forms and were not limited to dysthymia. Nonetheless, the distinction between chronic and nonchronic forms of depression was relatively stable over the follow-up period. Mixed-effects models indicated that patients with dysthymic disorder experienced a significantly slower rate of improvement in symptoms over time and exhibited significantly greater depression at the 10-year point, compared to patients with nonchronic major depression.
Dysthymic disorder has a protracted course and is associated with a high risk of relapse. The nature of chronic depressive episodes varies over time within individuals, indicating that the various manifestations of chronic depression in DSM-IV do not represent distinct disorders. However, the distinction between chronic and nonchronic forms of depression is relatively stable and may provide a useful basis for subtyping in genetic and neurobiological research.
本研究旨在描述心境恶劣障碍的10年病程及转归。
作者对从多个门诊机构连续收治的97例早发性心境恶劣障碍成人患者和45例非慢性重度抑郁症成人患者进行了自然主义、前瞻性、纵向随访。随访数据来自该队列中90%的患者。在基线、30、60、90和120个月时进行评估。测量指标包括纵向间隔随访评估和汉密尔顿抑郁量表。
心境恶劣障碍的Kaplan-Meier估计康复率为73.9%,中位康复时间为52个月。康复患者中,再次陷入慢性抑郁期的估计风险为71.4%。慢性抑郁复发有多种形式,不限于心境恶劣障碍。尽管如此,在随访期间,慢性和非慢性抑郁症形式之间的区别相对稳定。混合效应模型表明,与非慢性重度抑郁症患者相比,心境恶劣障碍患者症状随时间改善的速度明显较慢,且在10年时抑郁程度明显更高。
心境恶劣障碍病程迁延,复发风险高。个体内慢性抑郁发作的性质随时间变化,表明《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版中慢性抑郁症的各种表现并不代表不同的疾病。然而,慢性和非慢性抑郁症形式之间的区别相对稳定,可能为基因和神经生物学研究中的亚型分类提供有用的基础。