• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉介入治疗中经桡动脉途径失败:解剖学因素

Failure of transradial approach during coronary interventions: anatomic considerations.

作者信息

Valsecchi Orazio, Vassileva Angelina, Musumeci Giuseppe, Rossini Roberta, Tespili Maurizio, Guagliumi Giulio, Mihalcsik Laurian, Gavazzi Antonello, Ferrazzi Paolo

机构信息

Interventional Cath Lab, Cardiovascular Department, Ospedali Riuniti of Bergamo, Italia.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Jun;67(6):870-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20732.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.20732
PMID:16649233
Abstract

The anatomy of the radial artery has yet to be systematically studied from the perspective of using it as a route for catheter access. We prospectively performed angiography of the arteries of the upper limb to delineate the anatomic features of the radial artery as a way to determine the feasibility of using it as a route for coronary intervention. We studied 2,211 consecutive patients submitted to transradial cardiac catheterization. In all patients, an angiography of the upper limb arteries was performed before and after procedure. Radial puncture was successful in 98.9% of patients. At angiography, anatomic variations of upper limb arteries were noted in 505 patients (22.8%) and included tortuous configurations (3.8%), stenosis (1.7%), hypoplasias (7.7%), radioulnar loop (0.8%), abnormal origin of the radial artery (8.3%), and lusoria subclavian artery (0.45%). Overall procedural success by transradial approach was 97.5%. Patients with anatomic variations of radial artery had a significantly lower puncture (96.2% vs 99.7%, P < 0.0001) and procedural (93.1% vs 98.8%, P < 0.0001) success. The procedure was successfully performed by radial approach in 98.8% of patients with tortuous configurations, 91.9% of radial stenosis, 93.9% of hypoplastic radial artery, 83.3% of radioulnar loop, 96.7% of radial axillary origin, and 60% of lusoria subclavian artery setting. Anatomic variations of the radial artery are not rare. However, they do not represent an important limitation in transradial approach if they are well documented previously.

摘要

从将桡动脉用作导管接入途径的角度来看,其解剖结构尚未得到系统研究。我们前瞻性地对上肢动脉进行血管造影,以描绘桡动脉的解剖特征,从而确定将其用作冠状动脉介入途径的可行性。我们研究了连续2211例接受经桡动脉心脏导管插入术的患者。在所有患者中,术前和术后均进行了上肢动脉血管造影。98.9%的患者桡动脉穿刺成功。血管造影时,505例患者(22.8%)发现上肢动脉解剖变异,包括迂曲形态(3.8%)、狭窄(1.7%)、发育不全(7.7%)、桡尺环(0.8%)、桡动脉异常起源(8.3%)和迷走锁骨下动脉(0.45%)。经桡动脉途径的总体手术成功率为97.5%。桡动脉解剖变异的患者穿刺成功率(96.2%对99.7%,P<0.0001)和手术成功率(93.1%对98.8%,P<0.0001)显著较低。在98.8%的迂曲形态患者、91.9%的桡动脉狭窄患者、93.9%的桡动脉发育不全患者、83.3%的桡尺环患者、96.7%的桡动脉腋部起源患者和60%的迷走锁骨下动脉患者中,经桡动脉途径成功完成了手术。桡动脉的解剖变异并不罕见。然而,如果之前有充分记录,它们在经桡动脉途径中并不代表重要限制。

相似文献

1
Failure of transradial approach during coronary interventions: anatomic considerations.冠状动脉介入治疗中经桡动脉途径失败:解剖学因素
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Jun;67(6):870-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20732.
2
Clinical study of arterial anatomic variations for transradial coronary procedure in Chinese population.中国人经桡动脉行冠状动脉介入治疗的动脉解剖变异的临床研究。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Sep 20;122(18):2097-102.
3
Arterial anatomic variations and its influence on transradial coronary procedural outcome.动脉解剖变异及其对经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗结果的影响。
J Interv Cardiol. 2012 Aug;25(4):418-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.2012.00693.x.
4
Anatomic variations of the radial artery in patients undergoing transradial coronary intervention.经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗患者桡动脉的解剖变异
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000 Apr;49(4):357-62. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1522-726x(200004)49:4<357::aid-ccd1>3.0.co;2-z.
5
Prevalence of abnormal upper limb arterial anatomy and its correlation with access failure during transradial coronary angiography.经桡动脉冠状动脉造影中异常上肢动脉解剖结构的流行情况及其与入路失败的相关性。
Indian Heart J. 2021 Jan-Feb;73(1):44-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2020.11.146. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
6
The effect of transradial coronary catheterization on upper limb function.经桡动脉冠状动脉介入治疗对上肢功能的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Apr 20;8(4):515-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2014.10.025. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
7
Anatomical considerations in transradial intervention.经桡动脉介入治疗的解剖学考量
Indian Heart J. 2010 May-Jun;62(3):211-3.
8
Feasibility and utility of pre-procedure ultrasound imaging of the arm to facilitate transradial coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures (PRIMAFACIE-TRI).经桡动脉途径行冠状动脉诊断和介入操作前超声臂成像的可行性和实用性研究(PRIMAFACIE-TRI)。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jul 1;82(1):64-73. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24585. Epub 2013 Feb 26.
9
Feasibility limits of transradial primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction in the real life (TRAP-AMI).经桡动脉直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性心肌梗死的真实世界可行性限制(TRAP-AMI)。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 30;168(2):1056-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.10.024. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
10
Safety and feasibility of transradial coronary angioplasty in elderly patients.老年患者经桡动脉冠状动脉成形术的安全性与可行性
Ital Heart J. 2004 Dec;5(12):926-31.

引用本文的文献

1
The Interscapular Lift: Unfolding the Tortuous Subclavian Artery.肩胛间上提术:显露迂曲的锁骨下动脉。
JACC Case Rep. 2025 Apr 16;30(8):103225. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2024.103225. Epub 2025 Feb 26.
2
Variations in the origin, course and branching pattern of the radial artery along with clinical correlations: narrative review.桡动脉起源、走行及分支模式的变异及其临床关联:叙述性综述
J Vasc Bras. 2025 Mar 14;24:e20240015. doi: 10.1590/1677-5449.202400152. eCollection 2025.
3
Endovascular Treatment of Malfunctioning Dialysis Fistulas: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis Comparing Transradial and Conventional Transvenous Access.
功能不良透析内瘘的血管内治疗:一项比较经桡动脉和传统经静脉入路的多中心回顾性分析
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jul;106(1):41-52. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31349. Epub 2024 Dec 26.
4
Arterial Accesses in Coronary Angiography and Intervention-Review with a Focus on Prognostic Relevance.冠状动脉造影和介入治疗中的动脉入路——聚焦预后相关性的综述
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 28;23(10):331. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2310331. eCollection 2022 Oct.
5
Safety and efficacy of brachial approach for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention.肱动脉入路用于冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的安全性和有效性。
Egypt Heart J. 2024 Mar 26;76(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s43044-024-00466-6.
6
Prospective evaluation of efficacy and safety of distal radial and radial artery access using a novel articulating-tip guidewire.使用新型关节头导丝对桡骨远端和桡动脉入路的疗效和安全性进行前瞻性评估。
J Vasc Access. 2025 Jan;26(1):211-216. doi: 10.1177/11297298231212227. Epub 2023 Nov 23.
7
Complications and related risk factors of transradial access cannulation for hemodynamic monitoring in general surgery: a prospective observational study.普外科经桡动脉入路血流动力学监测置管并发症及相关危险因素:一项前瞻性观察研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2023 Jun 30;23(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12871-023-02168-z.
8
Comparison of Radifocus versus Silverway Guidewires for Percutaneous Radial Angiography Following Failed Use of a J-Tip Guidewire.比较 Radifocus 与 Silverway 导丝在 J 型导丝失败后行经皮桡动脉血管造影术的应用。
Med Sci Monit. 2023 Apr 7;29:e939429. doi: 10.12659/MSM.939429.
9
Correlation of a guidewire maximum insertion length with tortuous radial artery and the success rate during transradial coronary angiography.导丝最大插入长度与桡动脉迂曲程度的相关性及其在经桡动脉冠状动脉造影中的成功率。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Nov 10;22(1):479. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02933-x.
10
Minimizing Guidewire Unwilling Passage and Related Perforation During Transradial Procedures: Prevention Is Better Than Cure.在经桡动脉手术中尽量减少导丝难以通过及相关穿孔:预防胜于治疗。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Mar 1;9:730648. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.730648. eCollection 2022.