Spencer Thomas J, Faraone Stephen V, Michelson David, Adler Lenard A, Reimherr Fred W, Glatt Stephen J, Biederman Joseph
Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2006 Mar;67(3):415-20. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v67n0312.
The objective of this study was to determine if measures of broad clinical psychopathology or neuropsychological performance could aid in the prediction of therapeutic response to the highly selective norepinephrine transporter inhibitor, atomoxetine, among adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).
We analyzed data from 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel design studies of adult patients (Study I, N = 280; Study II, N = 256) with DSM-IV-defined ADHD who were recruited by referral and advertising. Subjects were randomly assigned to 10 weeks of treatment with atomoxetine or placebo and were assessed with Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scales (CAARS), the General Well-Being Schedule (GWB), the Sheehan Disability Scale, the Stroop Color-Word Test (SCWT), and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) before and after treatment.
Therapeutic improvement on atomoxetine as evidenced by reduced CAARS scores was reliably predicted by the presence of a lifetime comorbid diagnosis of depression or post-traumatic stress disorder at baseline, while improvement on subscales of the GWB and Sheehan Disability Scale were predicted by these and other SCID endorsements, such as alcohol and substance use, as well as demographics such as age and gender. In light of the exploratory nature of this work and the many comparisons that were examined in the corresponding regression models, these findings should be regarded as tentative pending replication and extension in another dataset.
From these findings, we conclude that the variable responsiveness of individuals to atomoxetine cannot be largely accounted for by differences in broad-spectrum psychopathology or neuropsychological indicators of attentional capacity.
本研究的目的是确定广泛的临床精神病理学指标或神经心理学表现指标是否有助于预测注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)成人患者对高选择性去甲肾上腺素转运体抑制剂托莫西汀的治疗反应。
我们分析了两项双盲、安慰剂对照、平行设计研究的数据,这两项研究的对象是通过转诊和广告招募的符合DSM-IV定义的ADHD成年患者(研究I,N = 280;研究II,N = 256)。受试者被随机分配接受托莫西汀或安慰剂治疗10周,并在治疗前后用康纳斯成人ADHD评定量表(CAARS)、总体幸福感量表(GWB)、希恩残疾量表、斯特鲁普色词测验(SCWT)和DSM-IV结构化临床访谈(SCID)进行评估。
基线时存在终生共病的抑郁症或创伤后应激障碍诊断可可靠地预测托莫西汀治疗后CAARS评分降低所证明的治疗改善,而GWB和希恩残疾量表分量表的改善则由这些以及其他SCID认可因素预测,如酒精和物质使用,以及年龄和性别等人口统计学因素。鉴于这项工作的探索性质以及在相应回归模型中进行的众多比较,这些发现应被视为初步的,有待在另一个数据集中进行重复和扩展。
从这些发现中,我们得出结论,个体对托莫西汀的反应差异在很大程度上不能由广谱精神病理学或注意力容量的神经心理学指标差异来解释。